DOCT vs. FSEP
DOCT (FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - October) and FSEP (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September) are both exchange-traded funds - DOCT is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500, while FSEP is a Options Trading fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index September. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DOCT returned 7.74%/yr vs 10.07%/yr for FSEP. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.85% expense ratio.
Performance
DOCT vs. FSEP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DOCT achieves a 5.06% return, which is significantly lower than FSEP's 6.56% return.
DOCT
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 1.95%
- YTD
- 5.06%
- 6M
- 5.55%
- 1Y
- 16.45%
- 3Y*
- 10.96%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- —
FSEP
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 2.58%
- YTD
- 6.56%
- 6M
- 7.03%
- 1Y
- 17.62%
- 3Y*
- 14.44%
- 5Y*
- 10.07%
- 10Y*
- —
DOCT vs. FSEP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOCT FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - October | 5.06% | 12.50% | 8.28% | 16.13% | -5.27% | 6.89% | 145.23% |
FSEP FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September | 6.56% | 12.83% | 13.56% | 20.23% | -7.05% | 11.61% | 9.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between DOCT and FSEP is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2020 | 0.89 |
The correlation between DOCT and FSEP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
DOCT vs. FSEP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DOCT
FSEP
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
DOCT
FSEP
Financial Services
DOCT
FSEP
Communication Services
DOCT
FSEP
Consumer Cyclical
DOCT
FSEP
Healthcare
DOCT
FSEP
Industrials
DOCT
FSEP
Consumer Defensive
DOCT
FSEP
Energy
DOCT
FSEP
Utilities
DOCT
FSEP
Real Estate
DOCT
FSEP
Basic Materials
DOCT
FSEP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DOCT vs. FSEP — Risk / Return Rank
DOCT
FSEP
DOCT vs. FSEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - October (DOCT) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September (FSEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DOCT | FSEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.47 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.81 | 3.15 | +0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.15 | 15.90 | +3.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DOCT | FSEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.77 | 2.36 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.06 | 0.94 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 1.10 | -0.57 |
Drawdowns
DOCT vs. FSEP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DOCT drawdown since its inception was -9.92%, smaller than the maximum FSEP drawdown of -13.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOCT and FSEP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DOCT | FSEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.92% | -13.79% | +3.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.34% | -5.62% | +1.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.92% | -12.37% | +2.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.92% | -13.79% | +3.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -0.22% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.54% | -2.14% | +0.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.86% | 1.11% | -0.25% |
Volatility
DOCT vs. FSEP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - October (DOCT) is 0.86%, while FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September (FSEP) has a volatility of 1.19%. This indicates that DOCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DOCT | FSEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.86% | 1.19% | -0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.40% | 5.79% | -1.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.96% | 7.52% | -1.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.33% | 10.79% | -3.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.58% | 10.54% | +38.04% |
DOCT vs. FSEP - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DOCT and FSEP have an expense ratio of 0.85%.
Dividends
DOCT vs. FSEP - Dividend Comparison
Neither DOCT nor FSEP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, DOCT and FSEP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FSEP has higher volatility (1.19%) compared to DOCT (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DOCT dropped -9.92% vs FSEP's -13.79%.
On 5-year performance, FSEP leads with 10.07% vs 7.74% for DOCT. Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. On volatility, DOCT has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FSEP has performed better with a 10.07% return vs 7.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DOCT and FSEP have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.
DOCT and FSEP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
DOCT is categorized as Defined Outcome, while FSEP is Options Trading. DOCT tracks S&P 500, while FSEP tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index September.
DOCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DOCT and FSEP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer