PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
DOCT vs. FFRHX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between DOCT and FFRHX is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

DOCT vs. FFRHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - October (DOCT) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
3.96%
4.53%
DOCT
FFRHX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

DOCT:

2.04

FFRHX:

3.27

Sortino Ratio

DOCT:

2.87

FFRHX:

9.76

Omega Ratio

DOCT:

1.48

FFRHX:

3.15

Calmar Ratio

DOCT:

4.40

FFRHX:

9.68

Martin Ratio

DOCT:

18.98

FFRHX:

45.87

Ulcer Index

DOCT:

0.47%

FFRHX:

0.18%

Daily Std Dev

DOCT:

4.39%

FFRHX:

2.54%

Max Drawdown

DOCT:

-9.35%

FFRHX:

-22.19%

Current Drawdown

DOCT:

0.00%

FFRHX:

-0.22%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DOCT achieves a 2.22% return, which is significantly higher than FFRHX's 0.39% return.


DOCT

YTD

2.22%

1M

1.16%

6M

3.96%

1Y

8.65%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FFRHX

YTD

0.39%

1M

0.39%

6M

4.53%

1Y

8.36%

5Y*

5.58%

10Y*

4.76%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DOCT vs. FFRHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DOCT has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FFRHX's 0.67% expense ratio.


DOCT
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - October
Expense ratio chart for DOCT: current value at 0.85% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.85%
Expense ratio chart for FFRHX: current value at 0.67% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.67%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

DOCT vs. FFRHX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DOCT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DOCT is 8888
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DOCT is 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DOCT is 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DOCT is 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DOCT is 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DOCT is 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

FFRHX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FFRHX is 9898
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FFRHX is 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FFRHX is 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FFRHX is 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FFRHX is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FFRHX is 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

DOCT vs. FFRHX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - October (DOCT) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for DOCT, currently valued at 1.99, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.993.27
The chart of Sortino ratio for DOCT, currently valued at 2.79, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.799.76
The chart of Omega ratio for DOCT, currently valued at 1.48, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.483.15
The chart of Calmar ratio for DOCT, currently valued at 4.27, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.004.279.68
The chart of Martin ratio for DOCT, currently valued at 18.44, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0018.4445.87
DOCT
FFRHX

The current DOCT Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is lower than the FFRHX Sharpe Ratio of 3.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DOCT and FFRHX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio2.002.503.003.504.004.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.99
3.27
DOCT
FFRHX

Dividends

DOCT vs. FFRHX - Dividend Comparison

DOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FFRHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.24%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
DOCT
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FFRHX
Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund
8.24%8.33%8.25%5.06%3.27%3.85%5.17%4.75%4.01%3.94%4.25%4.00%

Drawdowns

DOCT vs. FFRHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DOCT drawdown since its inception was -9.35%, smaller than the maximum FFRHX drawdown of -22.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOCT and FFRHX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-2.00%-1.50%-1.00%-0.50%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February0
-0.22%
DOCT
FFRHX

Volatility

DOCT vs. FFRHX - Volatility Comparison

FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - October (DOCT) has a higher volatility of 1.56% compared to Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX) at 0.66%. This indicates that DOCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFRHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%2.50%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.56%
0.66%
DOCT
FFRHX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab