DOCT vs. NAPR

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

DOCT (FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - October) and NAPR (Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April) are both exchange-traded funds - DOCT is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500, while NAPR is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DOCT returned 7.82%/yr vs 10.27%/yr for NAPR. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DOCT charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for NAPR.

Performance

DOCT vs. NAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - October (DOCT) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DOCT achieves a 5.27% return, which is significantly lower than NAPR's 10.64% return.

DOCT

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 1.90%
• YTD: 5.27%
• 6M: 5.91%
• 1Y: 17.16%
• 3Y*: 11.03%
• 5Y*: 7.82%
• 10Y*: —

NAPR

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.13%
• YTD: 10.64%
• 6M: 11.45%
• 1Y: 19.04%
• 3Y*: 13.30%
• 5Y*: 10.27%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DOCT vs. NAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DOCT FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - October	5.27%	12.50%	8.28%	16.13%	-5.27%	6.89%	145.69%
NAPR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April	10.64%	6.56%	13.29%	30.60%	-12.13%	9.09%	2.07%

Correlation

The correlation between DOCT and NAPR is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2020	0.76

The correlation between DOCT and NAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

DOCT vs. NAPR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DOCT	NAPR
Technology	36.2%	50.7%
Financial Services	11.9%	0.2%
Communication Services	10.9%	15.8%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	12.5%
Healthcare	8.4%	5.1%
Industrials	8.1%	3.3%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	8.7%
Energy	3.5%	0.7%
Utilities	2.3%	1.6%
Real Estate	1.9%	0.1%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.3%

Return for Risk

DOCT vs. NAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DOCT

DOCT Risk / Return Rank: 86
DOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
DOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
DOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 89
DOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
DOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 89

NAPR

NAPR Risk / Return Rank: 98
NAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
NAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
NAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 98
NAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
NAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DOCT vs. NAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - October (DOCT) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DOCT	NAPR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.89	4.92	-2.03
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.36	8.93	-4.57
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	2.23	-0.65
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.01	15.61	-11.61
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	20.21	88.84	-68.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DOCT vs. NAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DOCT Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is lower than the NAPR Sharpe Ratio of 4.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DOCT and NAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DOCT	NAPR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.89	4.92	-2.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.07	0.92	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	1.07	-0.54

Drawdowns

DOCT vs. NAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DOCT drawdown since its inception was -9.92%, smaller than the maximum NAPR drawdown of -16.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOCT and NAPR.

Drawdown Indicators

	DOCT	NAPR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.92%	-16.53%	+6.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.34%	-1.24%	-3.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.92%	-14.52%	+4.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-9.92%	-16.53%	+6.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.54%	-2.28%	+0.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.86%	0.22%	+0.64%

Volatility

DOCT vs. NAPR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - October (DOCT) is 0.88%, while Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR) has a volatility of 1.09%. This indicates that DOCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DOCT	NAPR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.88%	1.09%	-0.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.40%	2.82%	+1.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.96%	3.89%	+2.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.33%	11.27%	-3.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.60%	10.61%	+37.99%

DOCT vs. NAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DOCT has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than NAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

DOCT vs. NAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither DOCT nor NAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DOCT and NAPR in my portfolio?

DOCT and NAPR have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DOCT or NAPR?

NAPR has higher volatility (1.09%) compared to DOCT (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DOCT dropped -9.92% vs NAPR's -16.53%.

Which ETF is better, DOCT or NAPR?

On 5-year performance, NAPR leads with 10.27% vs 7.82% for DOCT. On fees, NAPR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, DOCT has been the lower-risk option at 0.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DOCT or NAPR?

Over the 5-year period, NAPR has performed better with a 10.27% return vs 7.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DOCT or NAPR?

NAPR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DOCT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DOCT or NAPR?

DOCT and NAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between DOCT and NAPR?

DOCT is categorized as Defined Outcome, while NAPR is Nasdaq-100. DOCT tracks S&P 500, while NAPR tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DOCT and 0.79% for NAPR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.92 vs 2.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.