DOCT vs. FFEB

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

DOCT (FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - October) and FFEB (FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February) are both Defined Outcome funds from FT Vest. DOCT is passively managed, while FFEB is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DOCT returned 7.82%/yr vs 11.35%/yr for FFEB. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.85% expense ratio.

Performance

DOCT vs. FFEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - October (DOCT) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DOCT achieves a 5.27% return, which is significantly lower than FFEB's 7.97% return.

DOCT

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 1.90%
• YTD: 5.27%
• 6M: 5.91%
• 1Y: 17.16%
• 3Y*: 11.03%
• 5Y*: 7.82%
• 10Y*: —

FFEB

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 2.46%
• YTD: 7.97%
• 6M: 9.15%
• 1Y: 20.20%
• 3Y*: 16.47%
• 5Y*: 11.35%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DOCT vs. FFEB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DOCT FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - October	5.27%	12.50%	8.28%	16.13%	-5.27%	6.89%	145.69%
FFEB FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February	7.97%	13.76%	16.64%	19.95%	-7.51%	16.26%	6.50%

Correlation

The correlation between DOCT and FFEB is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2020	0.85

The correlation between DOCT and FFEB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

DOCT vs. FFEB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DOCT	FFEB
Technology	36.2%	36.2%
Financial Services	11.9%	11.9%
Communication Services	10.9%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	10.1%
Healthcare	8.4%	8.4%
Industrials	8.1%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	4.9%
Energy	3.5%	3.5%
Utilities	2.3%	2.3%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.8%

Return for Risk

DOCT vs. FFEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DOCT

DOCT Risk / Return Rank: 86
DOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
DOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
DOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 89
DOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
DOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 89

FFEB

FFEB Risk / Return Rank: 84
FFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
FFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
FFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
FFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DOCT vs. FFEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - October (DOCT) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DOCT	FFEB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.89	2.85	+0.04
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.36	4.11	+0.25
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.58	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.01	3.58	+0.42
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	20.21	19.10	+1.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DOCT vs. FFEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DOCT Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is comparable to the FFEB Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DOCT and FFEB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DOCT	FFEB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.89	2.85	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.07	1.06	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	0.87	-0.34

Drawdowns

DOCT vs. FFEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DOCT drawdown since its inception was -9.92%, smaller than the maximum FFEB drawdown of -22.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOCT and FFEB.

Drawdown Indicators

	DOCT	FFEB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.92%	-22.81%	+12.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.34%	-5.73%	+1.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.92%	-11.89%	+1.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-9.92%	-13.85%	+3.93%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.54%	-2.40%	+0.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.86%	1.08%	-0.22%

Volatility

DOCT vs. FFEB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - October (DOCT) is 0.88%, while FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB) has a volatility of 1.24%. This indicates that DOCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DOCT	FFEB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.88%	1.24%	-0.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.40%	5.56%	-1.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.96%	7.12%	-1.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.33%	10.81%	-3.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.60%	13.75%	+34.85%

DOCT vs. FFEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DOCT and FFEB have an expense ratio of 0.85%.

Dividends

DOCT vs. FFEB - Dividend Comparison

Neither DOCT nor FFEB has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DOCT and FFEB in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, DOCT and FFEB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, DOCT or FFEB?

FFEB has higher volatility (1.24%) compared to DOCT (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DOCT dropped -9.92% vs FFEB's -22.81%.

Which ETF is better, DOCT or FFEB?

On 5-year performance, FFEB leads with 11.35% vs 7.82% for DOCT. Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. On volatility, DOCT has been the lower-risk option at 0.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DOCT or FFEB?

Over the 5-year period, FFEB has performed better with a 11.35% return vs 7.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DOCT or FFEB?

DOCT and FFEB have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DOCT or FFEB?

DOCT and FFEB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DOCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 2.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.