FSEP vs. XIMR
FSEP (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September) and XIMR (FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March) are both Options Trading funds from FT Vest. FSEP is passively managed, while XIMR is actively managed. Over the past year, FSEP returned 18.45% vs 8.75% for XIMR. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.85% expense ratio.
Performance
FSEP vs. XIMR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSEP achieves a 6.79% return, which is significantly higher than XIMR's 4.30% return.
FSEP
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 2.45%
- YTD
- 6.79%
- 6M
- 7.39%
- 1Y
- 18.45%
- 3Y*
- 14.52%
- 5Y*
- 10.17%
- 10Y*
- —
XIMR
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 4.30%
- 6M
- 4.92%
- 1Y
- 8.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FSEP vs. XIMR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FSEP FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September | 6.79% | 12.83% | 8.39% |
XIMR FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March | 4.30% | 6.80% | 5.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSEP and XIMR is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2024 | 0.66 |
The correlation between FSEP and XIMR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSEP vs. XIMR — Risk / Return Rank
FSEP
XIMR
FSEP vs. XIMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September (FSEP) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March (XIMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSEP | XIMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.46 | 4.36 | -1.90 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.55 | 8.55 | -5.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 2.44 | -0.95 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.33 | 8.03 | -4.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.83 | 69.26 | -52.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSEP | XIMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46 | 4.36 | -1.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | 1.74 | -0.64 |
Drawdowns
FSEP vs. XIMR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSEP drawdown since its inception was -13.79%, which is greater than XIMR's maximum drawdown of -5.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSEP and XIMR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSEP | XIMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.79% | -5.12% | -8.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.62% | -1.08% | -4.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.07% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.14% | -0.17% | -1.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.11% | 0.13% | +0.98% |
Volatility
FSEP vs. XIMR - Volatility Comparison
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September (FSEP) has a higher volatility of 1.23% compared to FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March (XIMR) at 0.35%. This indicates that FSEP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XIMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSEP | XIMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.23% | 0.35% | +0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.79% | 1.63% | +4.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.52% | 2.02% | +5.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.79% | 4.36% | +6.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.54% | 4.36% | +6.18% |
FSEP vs. XIMR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FSEP and XIMR have an expense ratio of 0.85%.
Dividends
FSEP vs. XIMR - Dividend Comparison
FSEP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XIMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.42%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FSEP FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XIMR FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March | 6.42% | 6.41% | 4.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSEP and XIMR have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSEP has higher volatility (1.23%) compared to XIMR (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSEP dropped -13.79% vs XIMR's -5.12%.
On 1-year performance, FSEP leads with 18.45% vs 8.75% for XIMR. Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. On volatility, XIMR has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FSEP has performed better with a 18.45% return vs 8.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FSEP and XIMR have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.
XIMR has the higher dividend yield at 6.42%, compared with 0.00% for FSEP.
XIMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.36 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSEP and XIMR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer