DOCS vs. GDXJ

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

DOCS (Doximity, Inc.) is a stock, while GDXJ (VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF) is Gold fund tracking the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. Over the past 3 years, DOCS returned -14.86%/yr vs 44.17%/yr for GDXJ. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

DOCS vs. GDXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DOCS achieves a -54.74% return, which is significantly lower than GDXJ's -8.37% return.

DOCS

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: -14.32%
• YTD: -54.74%
• 6M: -54.30%
• 1Y: -64.81%
• 3Y*: -14.86%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GDXJ

• 1D: 3.15%
• 1M: -19.14%
• YTD: -8.37%
• 6M: -6.68%
• 1Y: 51.06%
• 3Y*: 44.17%
• 5Y*: 16.23%
• 10Y*: 12.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DOCS vs. GDXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DOCS Doximity, Inc.	-54.74%	-17.06%	90.41%	-16.45%	-33.05%	21.76%
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF	-8.37%	172.28%	15.67%	7.12%	-14.53%	-10.20%

Correlation

The correlation between DOCS and GDXJ is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2021	0.17

The correlation between DOCS and GDXJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DOCS vs. GDXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DOCS

DOCS Risk / Return Rank: 5
DOCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
DOCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
DOCS Omega Ratio Rank: 2
DOCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
DOCS Martin Ratio Rank: 8

GDXJ

GDXJ Risk / Return Rank: 31
GDXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
GDXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
GDXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 33
GDXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
GDXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DOCS vs. GDXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DOCS	GDXJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.20	1.00	-2.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.96	1.45	-3.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.72	1.20	-0.48
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.85	1.30	-2.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.43	3.55	-4.98

DOCS vs. GDXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DOCS Sharpe Ratio is -1.20, which is lower than the GDXJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DOCS and GDXJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DOCS vs. GDXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DOCS drawdown since its inception was -82.35%, smaller than the maximum GDXJ drawdown of -88.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOCS and GDXJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	DOCS	GDXJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.35%	-88.66%	+6.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-76.03%	-39.47%	-36.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-78.34%	-39.47%	-38.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-49.76%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-57.77%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-80.36%	-33.25%	-47.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-57.18%	-60.45%	+3.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	45.49%	14.41%	+31.08%

Volatility

DOCS vs. GDXJ - Volatility Comparison

Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) has a higher volatility of 29.57% compared to VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) at 19.46%. This indicates that DOCS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DOCS	GDXJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	29.57%	19.46%	+10.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	44.93%	43.41%	+1.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	54.14%	51.54%	+2.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	70.07%	41.50%	+28.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	70.07%	44.23%	+25.84%

Dividends

DOCS vs. GDXJ - Dividend Comparison

DOCS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DOCS Doximity, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF	2.54%	2.33%	2.61%	0.72%	0.51%	1.78%	1.58%	0.39%	0.45%	0.03%	4.78%	0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DOCS and GDXJ in my portfolio?

DOCS and GDXJ have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DOCS or GDXJ?

DOCS has higher volatility (29.57%) compared to GDXJ (19.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DOCS dropped -82.35% vs GDXJ's -88.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GDXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs -1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.