DNOV vs. NVDO
DNOV (FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November) and NVDO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. DNOV is passively managed, while NVDO is actively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DNOV charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for NVDO.
Performance
DNOV vs. NVDO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DNOV achieves a 4.96% return, which is significantly lower than NVDO's 21.85% return.
DNOV
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 1.74%
- YTD
- 4.96%
- 6M
- 5.56%
- 1Y
- 18.05%
- 3Y*
- 13.20%
- 5Y*
- 8.18%
- 10Y*
- —
NVDO
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 16.94%
- YTD
- 21.85%
- 6M
- 31.84%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DNOV vs. NVDO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DNOV FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November | 4.96% | 6.42% |
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF | 21.85% | 11.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between DNOV and NVDO is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2025 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DNOV vs. NVDO — Risk / Return Rank
DNOV
NVDO
DNOV vs. NVDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November (DNOV) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DNOV | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.17 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.78 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.67 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.37 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.48 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DNOV | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 1.45 | -0.54 |
Drawdowns
DNOV vs. NVDO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DNOV drawdown since its inception was -15.03%, smaller than the maximum NVDO drawdown of -16.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNOV and NVDO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DNOV | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.03% | -16.25% | +1.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.23% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.01% | -5.00% | +2.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.78% | — | — |
Volatility
DNOV vs. NVDO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DNOV | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.85% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.21% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.73% | 31.88% | -26.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.62% | 31.88% | -24.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.04% | 31.88% | -22.84% |
DNOV vs. NVDO - Expense Ratio Comparison
DNOV has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDO's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
DNOV vs. NVDO - Dividend Comparison
DNOV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.67%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
DNOV FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF | 13.67% | 16.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DNOV and NVDO have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NVDO is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NVDO is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DNOV.
NVDO has the higher dividend yield at 13.67%, compared with 0.00% for DNOV.
They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DNOV and 0.77% for NVDO.
Find the right allocation for DNOV and NVDO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer