DNOV vs. BUFZ

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

DNOV (FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November) and BUFZ (FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DNOV is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500, while BUFZ is a Options Trading fund actively managed by FT Vest. DNOV is passively managed, while BUFZ is actively managed. Over the past year, DNOV returned 18.05% vs 14.90% for BUFZ. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DNOV charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for BUFZ.

Performance

DNOV vs. BUFZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November (DNOV) and FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DNOV having a 4.96% return and BUFZ slightly higher at 5.20%.

DNOV

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 1.74%
• YTD: 4.96%
• 6M: 5.56%
• 1Y: 18.05%
• 3Y*: 13.20%
• 5Y*: 8.18%
• 10Y*: —

BUFZ

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 1.68%
• YTD: 5.20%
• 6M: 6.08%
• 1Y: 14.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DNOV vs. BUFZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DNOV FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November	4.96%	13.93%	10.71%	12.93%
BUFZ FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF	5.20%	11.05%	11.48%	8.75%

Correlation

The correlation between DNOV and BUFZ is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2023	0.88

The correlation between DNOV and BUFZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

DNOV vs. BUFZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DNOV	BUFZ
Technology	36.2%	36.2%
Financial Services	11.9%	11.9%
Communication Services	10.9%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	10.1%
Healthcare	8.4%	8.4%
Industrials	8.1%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	4.9%
Energy	3.5%	3.5%
Utilities	2.3%	2.3%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.8%

Return for Risk

DNOV vs. BUFZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DNOV

DNOV Risk / Return Rank: 90
DNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
DNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
DNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 93
DNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
DNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 92

BUFZ

BUFZ Risk / Return Rank: 88
BUFZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
BUFZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
BUFZ Omega Ratio Rank: 91
BUFZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
BUFZ Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DNOV vs. BUFZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November (DNOV) and FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DNOV	BUFZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.17	2.88	+0.29
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.78	4.36	+0.42
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.67	1.60	+0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.37	4.29	+0.08
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	23.48	23.30	+0.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DNOV vs. BUFZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DNOV Sharpe Ratio is 3.17, which is comparable to the BUFZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DNOV and BUFZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DNOV	BUFZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.17	2.88	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.08	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.92	1.97	-1.06

Drawdowns

DNOV vs. BUFZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DNOV drawdown since its inception was -15.03%, which is greater than BUFZ's maximum drawdown of -10.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNOV and BUFZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	DNOV	BUFZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.03%	-10.14%	-4.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.18%	-3.51%	-0.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.98%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-9.98%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.01%	-0.65%	-1.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.78%	0.65%	+0.13%

Volatility

DNOV vs. BUFZ - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November (DNOV) has a higher volatility of 0.85% compared to FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFZ) at 0.74%. This indicates that DNOV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DNOV	BUFZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.85%	0.74%	+0.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.21%	4.01%	+0.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.73%	5.20%	+0.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.62%	7.33%	+0.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.04%	7.33%	+1.71%

DNOV vs. BUFZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DNOV has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

DNOV vs. BUFZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither DNOV nor BUFZ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DNOV and BUFZ in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, DNOV and BUFZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, DNOV or BUFZ?

DNOV has higher volatility (0.85%) compared to BUFZ (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DNOV dropped -15.03% vs BUFZ's -10.14%.

Which ETF is better, DNOV or BUFZ?

On 1-year performance, DNOV leads with 18.05% vs 14.90% for BUFZ. On fees, DNOV is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, BUFZ has been the lower-risk option at 0.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DNOV or BUFZ?

Over the 1-year period, DNOV has performed better with a 18.05% return vs 14.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DNOV or BUFZ?

DNOV is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for BUFZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DNOV or BUFZ?

DNOV and BUFZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between DNOV and BUFZ?

DNOV is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BUFZ is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DNOV and 1.05% for BUFZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DNOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 2.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.