BUFZ vs. FFEB

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFZ) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB).

BUFZ and FFEB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BUFZ is an actively managed fund by FT Vest. It was launched on Oct 25, 2023. FFEB is an actively managed fund by FT Vest. It was launched on Feb 21, 2020.

Performance

BUFZ vs. FFEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFZ) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BUFZ vs. FFEB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BUFZ FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF	-0.98%	11.05%	11.48%	8.75%
FFEB FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February	-1.36%	13.76%	16.64%	12.50%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFZ achieves a -0.98% return, which is significantly higher than FFEB's -1.36% return.

BUFZ

• 1D: 1.55%
• 1M: -1.63%
• YTD: -0.98%
• 6M: 1.43%
• 1Y: 11.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FFEB

• 1D: 1.97%
• 1M: -3.34%
• YTD: -1.36%
• 6M: 1.28%
• 1Y: 14.47%
• 3Y*: 14.32%
• 5Y*: 9.99%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFZ vs. FFEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFZ has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FFEB's 0.85% expense ratio.

BUFZ

FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF

FFEB

FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February

Return for Risk

BUFZ vs. FFEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFZ

BUFZ Risk / Return Rank: 75
BUFZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
BUFZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
BUFZ Omega Ratio Rank: 80
BUFZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
BUFZ Martin Ratio Rank: 85

FFEB

FFEB Risk / Return Rank: 73
FFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
FFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
FFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 78
FFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
FFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFZ vs. FFEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFZ) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BUFZ	FFEB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	1.17	+0.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.85	1.76	+0.09
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.30	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.73	1.72	+0.01
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.89	9.15	+0.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BUFZ vs. FFEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the FFEB Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFZ and FFEB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BUFZ	FFEB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.25	1.17	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.92	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.69	0.77	+0.92

Correlation

The correlation between BUFZ and FFEB is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

BUFZ vs. FFEB - Dividend Comparison

Neither BUFZ nor FFEB has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BUFZ vs. FFEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFZ drawdown since its inception was -10.14%, smaller than the maximum FFEB drawdown of -22.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFZ and FFEB.

Drawdown Indicators

	BUFZ	FFEB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.14%	-22.81%	+12.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.98%	-8.65%	+1.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-13.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.01%	-3.87%	+1.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.68%	-2.46%	+1.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.22%	1.62%	-0.40%

Volatility

BUFZ vs. FFEB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFZ) is 2.81%, while FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB) has a volatility of 3.72%. This indicates that BUFZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BUFZ	FFEB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.81%	3.72%	-0.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.14%	5.65%	-1.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.49%	12.39%	-2.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.50%	10.88%	-3.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.50%	13.90%	-6.40%