PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUFZ vs. FDMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BUFZ vs. FDMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFZ) and Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BUFZ vs. FDMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BUFZ
FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF
-0.98%11.05%11.48%8.75%
FDMO
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF
-4.46%21.43%32.78%18.06%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFZ achieves a -0.98% return, which is significantly higher than FDMO's -4.46% return.


BUFZ

1D
1.55%
1M
-1.63%
YTD
-0.98%
6M
1.43%
1Y
11.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FDMO

1D
3.97%
1M
-4.65%
YTD
-4.46%
6M
-3.37%
1Y
23.95%
3Y*
22.48%
5Y*
12.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BUFZ vs. FDMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFZ has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FDMO's 0.29% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BUFZ vs. FDMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFZ
BUFZ Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
BUFZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFZ Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

FDMO
FDMO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFZ vs. FDMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFZ) and Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BUFZFDMODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.25

1.08

+0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.85

1.64

+0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.23

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

2.03

-0.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.89

7.44

+2.45

BUFZ vs. FDMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the FDMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFZ and FDMO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUFZFDMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

1.08

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.69

0.72

+0.97

Correlation

The correlation between BUFZ and FDMO is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BUFZ vs. FDMO - Dividend Comparison

BUFZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BUFZ
FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FDMO
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF
0.67%0.61%0.90%0.87%1.19%0.60%0.77%1.23%1.22%1.09%0.45%

Drawdowns

BUFZ vs. FDMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFZ drawdown since its inception was -10.14%, smaller than the maximum FDMO drawdown of -33.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFZ and FDMO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BUFZFDMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.14%

-33.94%

+23.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.98%

-12.33%

+5.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.01%

-8.73%

+6.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.68%

-5.49%

+4.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.22%

3.36%

-2.14%

Volatility

BUFZ vs. FDMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest Laddered Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFZ) is 2.81%, while Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) has a volatility of 7.54%. This indicates that BUFZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BUFZFDMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.81%

7.54%

-4.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.14%

13.62%

-9.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.49%

22.23%

-12.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.50%

18.98%

-11.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.50%

19.55%

-12.05%