DNNG vs. CRWG
DNNG (Leverage Shares 2X Long DNN Daily ETF) and CRWG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. DNNG is passively managed, while CRWG is actively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
DNNG vs. CRWG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DNNG
- 1D
- -6.12%
- 1M
- -9.26%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRWG
- 1D
- -9.28%
- 1M
- -14.93%
- YTD
- 21.96%
- 6M
- -0.38%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DNNG vs. CRWG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DNNG Leverage Shares 2X Long DNN Daily ETF | -48.80% |
CRWG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF | -24.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between DNNG and CRWG is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2026 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DNNG vs. CRWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long DNN Daily ETF (DNNG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF (CRWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DNNG vs. CRWG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DNNG drawdown since its inception was -65.39%, smaller than the maximum CRWG drawdown of -89.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNNG and CRWG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DNNG | CRWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.39% | -89.42% | +24.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.29% | -81.78% | +24.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.10% | -68.92% | +34.82% |
Volatility
DNNG vs. CRWG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DNNG | CRWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 118.09% | 189.18% | -71.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 118.09% | 189.18% | -71.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 118.09% | 189.18% | -71.09% |
DNNG vs. CRWG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DNNG and CRWG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
DNNG vs. CRWG - Dividend Comparison
DNNG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CRWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.06%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CRWG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF | 6.06% | 7.39% |
DNNG Leverage Shares 2X Long DNN Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DNNG and CRWG have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DNNG and CRWG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
CRWG has the higher dividend yield at 6.06%, compared with 0.00% for DNNG.
Find the right allocation for DNNG and CRWG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer