DNN vs. URA

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

DNN (Denison Mines Corp) is a stock, while URA (Global X Uranium ETF) is Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. Over the past 10 years, DNN returned 18.94%/yr vs 15.90%/yr for URA. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

DNN vs. URA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Denison Mines Corp (DNN) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DNN achieves a 15.04% return, which is significantly higher than URA's 6.53% return. Over the past 10 years, DNN has outperformed URA with an annualized return of 18.94%, while URA has yielded a comparatively lower 15.90% annualized return.

DNN

• 1D: 2.00%
• 1M: -12.32%
• YTD: 15.04%
• 6M: 17.24%
• 1Y: 85.45%
• 3Y*: 36.24%
• 5Y*: 16.76%
• 10Y*: 18.94%

URA

• 1D: 1.54%
• 1M: -13.30%
• YTD: 6.53%
• 6M: 3.57%
• 1Y: 32.00%
• 3Y*: 32.17%
• 5Y*: 18.77%
• 10Y*: 15.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DNN vs. URA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DNN Denison Mines Corp	15.04%	47.78%	1.69%	53.91%	-16.06%	111.75%	54.05%	-9.48%	-15.64%	6.86%
URA Global X Uranium ETF	6.53%	67.18%	-0.58%	46.25%	-11.32%	57.57%	41.33%	-3.54%	-22.11%	19.36%

Correlation

The correlation between DNN and URA is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2010	0.72

The correlation between DNN and URA shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (all time) to 0.87 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DNN vs. URA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DNN

DNN Risk / Return Rank: 80
DNN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
DNN Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
DNN Omega Ratio Rank: 75
DNN Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
DNN Martin Ratio Rank: 82

URA

URA Risk / Return Rank: 23
URA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
URA Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
URA Omega Ratio Rank: 23
URA Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
URA Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DNN vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Denison Mines Corp (DNN) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DNN	URA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	0.64	+0.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.09	1.21	+0.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.14	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.54	1.04	+1.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.49	2.30	+4.19

DNN vs. URA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DNN Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is higher than the URA Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DNN and URA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DNN vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DNN drawdown since its inception was -98.96%, which is greater than URA's maximum drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNN and URA.

Drawdown Indicators

	DNN	URA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.96%	-93.54%	-5.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.24%	-31.48%	-3.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-52.48%	-37.81%	-14.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.66%	-37.90%	-17.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-75.90%	-61.45%	-14.45%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-84.13%	-48.34%	-35.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-85.05%	-74.94%	-10.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.74%	14.12%	-0.38%

Volatility

DNN vs. URA - Volatility Comparison

Denison Mines Corp (DNN) has a higher volatility of 19.82% compared to Global X Uranium ETF (URA) at 17.69%. This indicates that DNN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DNN	URA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.82%	17.69%	+2.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.75%	39.95%	+6.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	61.29%	51.24%	+10.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	63.48%	43.96%	+19.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	64.30%	37.91%	+26.39%

Dividends

DNN vs. URA - Dividend Comparison

DNN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while URA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DNN Denison Mines Corp	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
URA Global X Uranium ETF	4.58%	4.88%	2.86%	6.07%	0.76%	5.84%	1.69%	1.66%	0.44%	2.03%	7.28%	1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DNN and URA in my portfolio?

DNN and URA have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DNN or URA?

DNN has higher volatility (19.82%) compared to URA (17.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DNN dropped -98.96% vs URA's -93.54%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DNN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.