DNN vs. GORO

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

DNN (Denison Mines Corp) and GORO (Gold Resource Corporation) are both stocks. DNN operates in Uranium (Energy), while GORO operates in Gold (Basic Materials).

Performance

DNN vs. GORO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Denison Mines Corp (DNN) and Gold Resource Corporation (GORO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DNN

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: -15.52%
• 6M: -23.31%
• YTD: 6.39%
• 1Y: 32.24%
• 3Y*: 32.38%
• 5Y*: 21.93%
• 10Y*: 17.80%
• ALL TIME*: -5.79%

GORO

• 1D: -17.75%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DNN vs. GORO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
DNN Denison Mines Corp	0.35%
GORO Gold Resource Corporation	-17.75%

Fundamentals

Market Cap DNN : $2.56B GORO : $452.08M
EPS DNN : -CA$0.28 GORO : $0.04
PS Ratio DNN : 822.83 GORO : 6.01
PB Ratio DNN : 13.73 GORO : 11.03
Total Revenue (TTM) DNN : CA$4.34M GORO : $81.00M
Gross Profit (TTM) DNN : -CA$12.87M GORO : $38.71M
EBITDA (TTM) DNN : -CA$155.36M GORO : $43.09M

Return for Risk

DNN vs. GORO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DNN

DNN Risk / Return Rank: 64
DNN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
DNN Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
DNN Omega Ratio Rank: 60
DNN Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
DNN Martin Ratio Rank: 65

GORO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DNN vs. GORO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Denison Mines Corp (DNN) and Gold Resource Corporation (GORO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DNN	GORO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.54	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.14	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.91	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.99	—	—

Drawdowns

DNN vs. GORO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DNN drawdown since its inception was -98.96%, which is greater than GORO's maximum drawdown of -17.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNN and GORO.

Drawdown Indicators

	DNN	GORO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.96%	-17.75%	-81.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.47%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-52.48%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.66%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-75.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-85.32%	-17.75%	-67.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-85.04%	-17.75%	-67.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.25%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DNN	GORO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.06%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.40%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	60.30%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	63.09%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	64.40%	—	—

Dividends

DNN vs. GORO - Dividend Comparison

Neither DNN nor GORO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials