PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GORO vs. KGC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GORO vs. KGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gold Resource Corporation (GORO) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GORO

1D
-6.73%
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

KGC

1D
-2.20%
1M
-6.52%
6M
-26.61%
YTD
-17.75%
1Y
43.30%
3Y*
71.30%
5Y*
30.97%
10Y*
16.68%
ALL TIME*
4.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$6.81M$6.81M$6.81M
$162.18M$178.21M$212.46M

GORO vs. KGC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GORO and KGC is -0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2026

-0.01

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GORO:

$339.86M

KGC:

$27.58B

EPS

GORO:

$0.04

KGC:

$2.61

PE Ratio

GORO:

46.64

KGC:

8.84

PEG Ratio

GORO:

1.38

KGC:

0.12

PS Ratio

GORO:

3.80

KGC:

3.32

PB Ratio

GORO:

6.98

KGC:

2.86

Total Revenue (TTM)

GORO:

$81.00M

KGC:

$8.39B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GORO:

$38.71M

KGC:

$4.50B

EBITDA (TTM)

GORO:

$43.09M

KGC:

$5.58B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GORO vs. KGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GORO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


KGC
KGC Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
KGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
KGC Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
KGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
KGC Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GORO vs. KGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold Resource Corporation (GORO) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GOROKGCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.49

GORO vs. KGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GORO vs. KGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GORO drawdown since its inception was -50.00%, smaller than the maximum KGC drawdown of -96.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GORO and KGC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOROKGCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.00%

-96.00%

+46.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.00%

-39.16%

-8.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.85%

-57.51%

+15.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.22%

Volatility

GORO vs. KGC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOROKGCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

162.11%

52.21%

+109.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

162.11%

44.41%

+117.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

162.11%

46.87%

+115.24%

Dividends

GORO vs. KGC - Dividend Comparison

GORO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
GORO
Gold Resource Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KGC
Kinross Gold Corporation
0.63%0.44%1.29%1.98%2.93%2.69%0.82%

Financials

GORO vs. KGC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gold Resource Corporation and Kinross Gold Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


GORO and KGC have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GORO and KGC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer