DNLAX vs. DRTHX
Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A (DNLAX) and BNY Mellon Sustainable U.S. Equity Fund (DRTHX).
DNLAX is managed by BNY Mellon. It was launched on Oct 31, 2003. DRTHX is managed by BNY Mellon. It was launched on Mar 29, 1972.
Performance
DNLAX vs. DRTHX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DNLAX vs. DRTHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNLAX BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A | 24.60% | 14.75% | 0.86% | 1.33% | 33.83% | 38.00% | 6.30% | 16.33% | -17.78% | 13.69% |
DRTHX BNY Mellon Sustainable U.S. Equity Fund | -5.88% | 15.96% | 39.07% | 24.01% | -23.10% | 26.71% | 24.21% | 34.01% | -4.54% | 15.01% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DNLAX achieves a 24.60% return, which is significantly higher than DRTHX's -5.88% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DNLAX having a 14.25% annualized return and DRTHX not far behind at 13.72%.
DNLAX
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- -0.73%
- YTD
- 24.60%
- 6M
- 33.31%
- 1Y
- 48.70%
- 3Y*
- 14.47%
- 5Y*
- 17.85%
- 10Y*
- 14.25%
DRTHX
- 1D
- 2.97%
- 1M
- -6.12%
- YTD
- -5.88%
- 6M
- -3.69%
- 1Y
- 16.76%
- 3Y*
- 21.08%
- 5Y*
- 11.56%
- 10Y*
- 13.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DNLAX vs. DRTHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DNLAX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than DRTHX's 0.74% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DNLAX vs. DRTHX — Risk / Return Rank
DNLAX
DRTHX
DNLAX vs. DRTHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A (DNLAX) and BNY Mellon Sustainable U.S. Equity Fund (DRTHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DNLAX | DRTHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.87 | 0.91 | +0.96 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.34 | 1.42 | +0.92 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.20 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 1.49 | +0.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.73 | 6.20 | +4.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DNLAX | DRTHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87 | 0.91 | +0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.63 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.75 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.41 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between DNLAX and DRTHX is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
DNLAX vs. DRTHX - Dividend Comparison
DNLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than DRTHX's 11.30% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNLAX BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A | 1.76% | 2.19% | 7.75% | 12.54% | 9.80% | 5.04% | 0.91% | 1.95% | 1.53% | 0.40% | 1.26% | 0.98% |
DRTHX BNY Mellon Sustainable U.S. Equity Fund | 11.30% | 10.63% | 17.93% | 3.41% | 12.94% | 4.19% | 3.13% | 2.31% | 4.74% | 26.74% | 5.37% | 15.21% |
Drawdowns
DNLAX vs. DRTHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DNLAX drawdown since its inception was -69.14%, which is greater than DRTHX's maximum drawdown of -63.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNLAX and DRTHX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DNLAX | DRTHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.14% | -63.27% | -5.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.87% | -11.96% | -8.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.37% | -27.58% | -4.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.45% | -31.34% | -23.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | -8.01% | +7.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.71% | -17.45% | -4.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.60% | 2.86% | +1.74% |
Volatility
DNLAX vs. DRTHX - Volatility Comparison
BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A (DNLAX) has a higher volatility of 6.24% compared to BNY Mellon Sustainable U.S. Equity Fund (DRTHX) at 5.68%. This indicates that DNLAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRTHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DNLAX | DRTHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.24% | 5.68% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.26% | 10.25% | +5.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.60% | 19.13% | +7.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.95% | 18.59% | +7.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.58% | 18.42% | +7.16% |