PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRTHX vs. DBMYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRTHX vs. DBMYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Sustainable U.S. Equity Fund (DRTHX) and BNY Mellon Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund Class Y (DBMYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRTHX achieves a 7.54% return, which is significantly higher than DBMYX's 5.00% return. Over the past 10 years, DRTHX has outperformed DBMYX with an annualized return of 15.24%, while DBMYX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.55% annualized return.


DRTHX

1D
0.42%
1M
3.38%
YTD
7.54%
6M
8.18%
1Y
23.09%
3Y*
24.65%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.24%

DBMYX

1D
-1.89%
1M
0.17%
YTD
5.00%
6M
3.56%
1Y
18.30%
3Y*
12.03%
5Y*
-0.16%
10Y*
11.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRTHX vs. DBMYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DRTHX
BNY Mellon Sustainable U.S. Equity Fund
7.54%15.96%39.07%24.01%-23.10%26.71%24.21%34.01%-4.54%15.01%
DBMYX
BNY Mellon Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund Class Y
5.00%11.94%10.09%15.63%-33.11%-4.44%68.62%39.27%-1.35%26.80%

Correlation

The correlation between DRTHX and DBMYX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.79

The correlation between DRTHX and DBMYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRTHX vs. DBMYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRTHX
DRTHX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
DRTHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRTHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRTHX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
DRTHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRTHX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

DBMYX
DBMYX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
DBMYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBMYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBMYX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
DBMYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBMYX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRTHX vs. DBMYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Sustainable U.S. Equity Fund (DRTHX) and BNY Mellon Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund Class Y (DBMYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DRTHXDBMYXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.85

0.90

+0.95

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.56

1.43

+1.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.16

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

0.95

+1.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.62

3.10

+6.52

DRTHX vs. DBMYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRTHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is higher than the DBMYX Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRTHX and DBMYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRTHXDBMYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

0.90

+0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

-0.01

+0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.48

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.43

-0.01

Drawdowns

DRTHX vs. DBMYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRTHX drawdown since its inception was -63.27%, which is greater than DBMYX's maximum drawdown of -48.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRTHX and DBMYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRTHXDBMYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.27%

-48.24%

-15.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.66%

-19.58%

+8.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.55%

-25.20%

+3.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.58%

-45.79%

+18.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.34%

-48.24%

+16.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-15.40%

+15.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.39%

-15.19%

-2.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.46%

6.03%

-3.57%

Volatility

DRTHX vs. DBMYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon Sustainable U.S. Equity Fund (DRTHX) is 3.19%, while BNY Mellon Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund Class Y (DBMYX) has a volatility of 6.26%. This indicates that DRTHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBMYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRTHXDBMYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.19%

6.26%

-3.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.78%

16.40%

-6.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.84%

21.11%

-8.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.56%

24.53%

-5.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.44%

24.28%

-5.84%

DRTHX vs. DBMYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRTHX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than DBMYX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRTHX vs. DBMYX - Dividend Comparison

DRTHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.89%, less than DBMYX's 48.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBMYX
BNY Mellon Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund Class Y
48.75%51.19%0.43%0.00%0.00%8.97%7.86%0.00%8.66%9.12%2.20%6.55%
DRTHX
BNY Mellon Sustainable U.S. Equity Fund
9.89%10.63%17.93%3.41%12.94%4.19%3.13%2.31%4.74%26.74%5.37%15.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRTHX and DBMYX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBMYX has higher volatility (6.26%) compared to DRTHX (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRTHX dropped -63.27% vs DBMYX's -48.24%.

DRTHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRTHX and DBMYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer