DNL vs. PRJPX
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DNL) and T. Rowe Price Japan Fund (PRJPX).
DNL is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. It was launched on Jun 16, 2006. PRJPX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Dec 29, 1991.
Performance
DNL vs. PRJPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DNL vs. PRJPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNL WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | -2.01% | 17.03% | -0.61% | 17.00% | -22.38% | 16.14% | 18.22% | 36.23% | -14.76% | 31.11% |
PRJPX T. Rowe Price Japan Fund | -2.51% | 32.21% | 6.13% | 2.02% | -27.37% | -11.03% | 34.60% | 27.56% | -12.24% | 32.06% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DNL achieves a -2.01% return, which is significantly higher than PRJPX's -2.51% return. Over the past 10 years, DNL has outperformed PRJPX with an annualized return of 8.10%, while PRJPX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.14% annualized return.
DNL
- 1D
- 3.65%
- 1M
- -7.91%
- YTD
- -2.01%
- 6M
- 0.32%
- 1Y
- 15.31%
- 3Y*
- 6.44%
- 5Y*
- 2.92%
- 10Y*
- 8.10%
PRJPX
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -14.17%
- YTD
- -2.51%
- 6M
- 1.32%
- 1Y
- 21.16%
- 3Y*
- 10.18%
- 5Y*
- -1.24%
- 10Y*
- 7.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DNL vs. PRJPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DNL has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than PRJPX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DNL vs. PRJPX — Risk / Return Rank
DNL
PRJPX
DNL vs. PRJPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DNL) and T. Rowe Price Japan Fund (PRJPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DNL | PRJPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.78 | 0.98 | -0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.22 | 1.43 | -0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.20 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.16 | 1.22 | -0.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.21 | 4.49 | -0.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DNL | PRJPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 | 0.98 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | -0.07 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.41 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.16 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between DNL and PRJPX is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
DNL vs. PRJPX - Dividend Comparison
DNL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, less than PRJPX's 15.03% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNL WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 1.87% | 2.06% | 2.30% | 1.81% | 4.82% | 1.38% | 1.76% | 1.93% | 2.55% | 1.86% | 2.51% | 1.98% |
PRJPX T. Rowe Price Japan Fund | 15.03% | 14.65% | 4.82% | 1.71% | 6.94% | 5.42% | 2.59% | 2.62% | 7.56% | 0.33% | 0.70% | 1.05% |
Drawdowns
DNL vs. PRJPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DNL drawdown since its inception was -44.53%, smaller than the maximum PRJPX drawdown of -68.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNL and PRJPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DNL | PRJPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.53% | -68.26% | +23.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.42% | -15.11% | +2.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.85% | -44.42% | +9.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.85% | -45.44% | +10.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.22% | -15.05% | +5.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.24% | -26.85% | +16.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.43% | 4.10% | -0.67% |
Volatility
DNL vs. PRJPX - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DNL) has a higher volatility of 9.11% compared to T. Rowe Price Japan Fund (PRJPX) at 8.47%. This indicates that DNL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRJPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DNL | PRJPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.11% | 8.47% | +0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.68% | 13.97% | -0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.69% | 20.46% | -0.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.94% | 18.91% | -0.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.52% | 17.52% | +1.00% |