PRJPX vs. FIQLX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Japan Fund (PRJPX) and Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z (FIQLX).

PRJPX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Dec 29, 1991. FIQLX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 2, 2018.

Performance

PRJPX vs. FIQLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Japan Fund (PRJPX) and Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z (FIQLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PRJPX vs. FIQLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
PRJPX T. Rowe Price Japan Fund	-2.51%	32.21%	6.13%	2.02%	-27.37%	-11.03%	34.60%	27.56%	-12.87%
FIQLX Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z	2.59%	31.84%	7.43%	16.09%	-22.16%	3.32%	25.58%	25.93%	-11.46%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRJPX achieves a -2.51% return, which is significantly lower than FIQLX's 2.59% return.

PRJPX

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: -14.17%
• YTD: -2.51%
• 6M: 1.32%
• 1Y: 21.16%
• 3Y*: 10.18%
• 5Y*: -1.24%
• 10Y*: 7.14%

FIQLX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -12.73%
• YTD: 2.59%
• 6M: 5.97%
• 1Y: 32.83%
• 3Y*: 16.22%
• 5Y*: 6.19%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRJPX vs. FIQLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRJPX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FIQLX's 0.96% expense ratio.

PRJPX

T. Rowe Price Japan Fund

FIQLX

Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z

Return for Risk

PRJPX vs. FIQLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRJPX

PRJPX Risk / Return Rank: 48
PRJPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
PRJPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
PRJPX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
PRJPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
PRJPX Martin Ratio Rank: 44

FIQLX

FIQLX Risk / Return Rank: 77
FIQLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
FIQLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
FIQLX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
FIQLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FIQLX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRJPX vs. FIQLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Japan Fund (PRJPX) and Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z (FIQLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PRJPX	FIQLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.98	1.38	-0.40
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.43	1.89	-0.46
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.26	-0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.22	2.08	-0.86
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.49	8.19	-3.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PRJPX vs. FIQLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRJPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is comparable to the FIQLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRJPX and FIQLX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PRJPX	FIQLX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98	1.38	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.07	0.32	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.16	0.46	-0.30

Correlation

The correlation between PRJPX and FIQLX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

PRJPX vs. FIQLX - Dividend Comparison

PRJPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.03%, more than FIQLX's 9.79% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PRJPX T. Rowe Price Japan Fund	15.03%	14.65%	4.82%	1.71%	6.94%	5.42%	2.59%	2.62%	7.56%	0.33%	0.70%	1.05%
FIQLX Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z	9.79%	10.04%	5.04%	3.88%	0.00%	11.89%	1.97%	1.35%	0.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

PRJPX vs. FIQLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRJPX drawdown since its inception was -68.26%, which is greater than FIQLX's maximum drawdown of -36.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRJPX and FIQLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRJPX	FIQLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.26%	-36.13%	-32.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.11%	-12.73%	-2.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.42%	-36.13%	-8.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.05%	-12.73%	-2.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.85%	-10.48%	-16.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.10%	3.51%	+0.59%

Volatility

PRJPX vs. FIQLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Japan Fund (PRJPX) is 8.47%, while Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z (FIQLX) has a volatility of 9.75%. This indicates that PRJPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIQLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRJPX	FIQLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.47%	9.75%	-1.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.97%	16.15%	-2.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.46%	22.81%	-2.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.91%	19.64%	-0.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.52%	19.73%	-2.21%