PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRJPX vs. FIQLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRJPX vs. FIQLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Japan Fund (PRJPX) and Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z (FIQLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRJPX achieves a 17.42% return, which is significantly lower than FIQLX's 21.46% return.


PRJPX

1D
3.58%
1M
4.19%
6M
11.18%
YTD
17.42%
1Y
32.29%
3Y*
16.34%
5Y*
3.38%
10Y*
7.93%
ALL TIME*
3.56%

FIQLX

1D
4.54%
1M
-2.13%
6M
12.66%
YTD
21.46%
1Y
36.46%
3Y*
20.04%
5Y*
9.94%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PRJPX vs. FIQLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PRJPX
T. Rowe Price Japan Fund
17.42%32.21%6.13%2.02%-27.37%-11.03%34.60%27.56%-12.87%
FIQLX
Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z
21.46%31.84%7.43%16.09%-22.16%3.32%25.58%25.93%-11.46%

Correlation

The correlation between PRJPX and FIQLX is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018

0.92

The correlation between PRJPX and FIQLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRJPX vs. FIQLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PRJPX
PRJPX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
PRJPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRJPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRJPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
PRJPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRJPX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

FIQLX
FIQLX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FIQLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIQLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIQLX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FIQLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIQLX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PRJPX vs. FIQLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Japan Fund (PRJPX) and Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z (FIQLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRJPXFIQLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.28

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

2.90

-0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.01

9.37

-2.36

PRJPX vs. FIQLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRJPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the FIQLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRJPX and FIQLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRJPX vs. FIQLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRJPX drawdown since its inception was -68.26%, which is greater than FIQLX's maximum drawdown of -36.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRJPX and FIQLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRJPXFIQLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.26%

-36.13%

-32.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.11%

-12.73%

-2.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.34%

-19.14%

+3.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.42%

-36.13%

-8.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-7.03%

+7.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.63%

-10.18%

-16.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.77%

3.93%

+0.84%

Volatility

PRJPX vs. FIQLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Japan Fund (PRJPX) is 6.30%, while Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z (FIQLX) has a volatility of 8.50%. This indicates that PRJPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIQLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRJPXFIQLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.30%

8.50%

-2.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.82%

19.65%

-3.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.33%

23.52%

-4.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.28%

20.57%

-1.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.64%

20.12%

-2.48%

PRJPX vs. FIQLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRJPX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FIQLX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRJPX vs. FIQLX - Dividend Comparison

PRJPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.48%, more than FIQLX's 8.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIQLX
Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z
8.27%10.04%5.04%3.88%0.00%11.89%1.97%1.35%0.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PRJPX
T. Rowe Price Japan Fund
12.48%14.65%4.82%1.71%6.94%5.42%2.59%2.62%7.56%0.33%0.70%1.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRJPX and FIQLX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIQLX has higher volatility (8.50%) compared to PRJPX (6.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRJPX dropped -68.26% vs FIQLX's -36.13%.

PRJPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRJPX and FIQLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer