DNL vs. KEMX
DNL (WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund) and KEMX (KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - DNL tracks the WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index while KEMX tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DNL returned 4.00%/yr vs 13.52%/yr for KEMX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DNL charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for KEMX.
Performance
DNL vs. KEMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DNL achieves a 10.17% return, which is significantly lower than KEMX's 42.26% return.
DNL
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- 3.92%
- YTD
- 10.17%
- 6M
- 11.58%
- 1Y
- 19.16%
- 3Y*
- 10.72%
- 5Y*
- 4.00%
- 10Y*
- 9.17%
KEMX
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- 13.02%
- YTD
- 42.26%
- 6M
- 47.92%
- 1Y
- 79.97%
- 3Y*
- 29.66%
- 5Y*
- 13.52%
- 10Y*
- —
DNL vs. KEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNL WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 10.17% | 17.03% | -0.61% | 17.00% | -22.38% | 16.14% | 18.22% | 16.21% |
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF | 42.26% | 38.28% | 0.36% | 20.57% | -19.35% | 10.55% | 12.84% | 7.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between DNL and KEMX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2019 | 0.82 |
The correlation between DNL and KEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
DNL vs. KEMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DNL
KEMX
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
Communication Services
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
DNL
KEMX
Consumer Cyclical
DNL
KEMX
Industrials
DNL
KEMX
Healthcare
DNL
KEMX
Energy
DNL
KEMX
Communication Services
DNL
KEMX
Financial Services
DNL
KEMX
Basic Materials
DNL
KEMX
Consumer Defensive
DNL
KEMX
Utilities
DNL
KEMX
Real Estate
DNL
-
KEMX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DNL vs. KEMX — Risk / Return Rank
DNL
KEMX
DNL vs. KEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DNL) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DNL | KEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.62 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | 5.24 | -3.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.55 | 20.86 | -15.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DNL | KEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 3.59 | -2.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.75 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.68 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
DNL vs. KEMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DNL drawdown since its inception was -44.53%, which is greater than KEMX's maximum drawdown of -38.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNL and KEMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DNL | KEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.53% | -38.80% | -5.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.42% | -15.36% | +2.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.15% | -19.62% | -0.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.85% | -30.85% | -4.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.96% | -1.31% | +0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.17% | -8.86% | -1.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.46% | 3.85% | -0.39% |
Volatility
DNL vs. KEMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DNL) is 5.51%, while KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) has a volatility of 9.86%. This indicates that DNL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DNL | KEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.51% | 9.86% | -4.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.96% | 19.90% | -4.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.90% | 22.40% | -4.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.21% | 18.21% | 0.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.65% | 20.94% | -2.29% |
DNL vs. KEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DNL has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than KEMX's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
DNL vs. KEMX - Dividend Comparison
DNL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, less than KEMX's 2.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNL WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 1.66% | 2.06% | 2.30% | 1.81% | 4.82% | 1.38% | 1.76% | 1.93% | 2.55% | 1.86% | 2.51% | 1.98% |
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF | 2.31% | 3.28% | 3.39% | 2.00% | 4.10% | 4.79% | 1.69% | 2.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DNL and KEMX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KEMX has higher volatility (9.86%) compared to DNL (5.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DNL dropped -44.53% vs KEMX's -38.80%.
On 5-year performance, KEMX leads with 13.52% vs 4.00% for DNL. On fees, KEMX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, DNL has been the lower-risk option at 5.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, KEMX has performed better with a 13.52% return vs 4.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KEMX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DNL.
KEMX has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 1.66% for DNL.
DNL tracks WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index, while KEMX tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DNL and 0.25% for KEMX.
KEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.59 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DNL and KEMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer