PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DNL vs. KEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DNL vs. KEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DNL) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DNL achieves a 10.17% return, which is significantly lower than KEMX's 42.26% return.


DNL

1D
-0.96%
1M
3.92%
YTD
10.17%
6M
11.58%
1Y
19.16%
3Y*
10.72%
5Y*
4.00%
10Y*
9.17%

KEMX

1D
-1.31%
1M
13.02%
YTD
42.26%
6M
47.92%
1Y
79.97%
3Y*
29.66%
5Y*
13.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DNL vs. KEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DNL
WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
10.17%17.03%-0.61%17.00%-22.38%16.14%18.22%16.21%
KEMX
KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF
42.26%38.28%0.36%20.57%-19.35%10.55%12.84%7.93%

Correlation

The correlation between DNL and KEMX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2019

0.82

The correlation between DNL and KEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

DNL vs. KEMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DNL
KEMX

Technology

33.0%
41.2%

Consumer Cyclical

18.5%
5.4%

Industrials

16.3%
8.6%

Healthcare

10.6%
1.7%

Energy

6.5%
4.8%

Communication Services

6.2%
3.2%

Financial Services

4.0%
20.7%

Basic Materials

3.2%
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

1.2%
3.0%

Utilities

0.5%
2.0%

Real Estate

-

1.2%

Technology

DNL
33.0%
KEMX
41.2%

Consumer Cyclical

DNL
18.5%
KEMX
5.4%

Industrials

DNL
16.3%
KEMX
8.6%

Healthcare

DNL
10.6%
KEMX
1.7%

Energy

DNL
6.5%
KEMX
4.8%

Communication Services

DNL
6.2%
KEMX
3.2%

Financial Services

DNL
4.0%
KEMX
20.7%

Basic Materials

DNL
3.2%
KEMX
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

DNL
1.2%
KEMX
3.0%

Utilities

DNL
0.5%
KEMX
2.0%

Real Estate

DNL

-

KEMX
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DNL vs. KEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DNL
DNL Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
DNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNL Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
DNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNL Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

KEMX
KEMX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
KEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
KEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
KEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
KEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DNL vs. KEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DNL) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DNLKEMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.62

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

5.24

-3.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.55

20.86

-15.31

DNL vs. KEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DNL Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is lower than the KEMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DNL and KEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DNLKEMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08

3.59

-2.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.75

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.68

-0.42

Drawdowns

DNL vs. KEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DNL drawdown since its inception was -44.53%, which is greater than KEMX's maximum drawdown of -38.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNL and KEMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DNLKEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.53%

-38.80%

-5.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.42%

-15.36%

+2.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.15%

-19.62%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.85%

-30.85%

-4.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.96%

-1.31%

+0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.17%

-8.86%

-1.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.46%

3.85%

-0.39%

Volatility

DNL vs. KEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DNL) is 5.51%, while KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) has a volatility of 9.86%. This indicates that DNL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DNLKEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.51%

9.86%

-4.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.96%

19.90%

-4.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.90%

22.40%

-4.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.21%

18.21%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.65%

20.94%

-2.29%

DNL vs. KEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DNL has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than KEMX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

DNL vs. KEMX - Dividend Comparison

DNL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, less than KEMX's 2.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DNL
WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.66%2.06%2.30%1.81%4.82%1.38%1.76%1.93%2.55%1.86%2.51%1.98%
KEMX
KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF
2.31%3.28%3.39%2.00%4.10%4.79%1.69%2.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DNL and KEMX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KEMX has higher volatility (9.86%) compared to DNL (5.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DNL dropped -44.53% vs KEMX's -38.80%.

On 5-year performance, KEMX leads with 13.52% vs 4.00% for DNL. On fees, KEMX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, DNL has been the lower-risk option at 5.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, KEMX has performed better with a 13.52% return vs 4.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KEMX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DNL.

KEMX has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 1.66% for DNL.

DNL tracks WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index, while KEMX tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DNL and 0.25% for KEMX.

KEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.59 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DNL and KEMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer