DNL vs. DHS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DNL (WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund) and DHS (WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - DNL is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index, while DHS is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DNL returned 9.17%/yr vs 9.47%/yr for DHS. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DNL charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for DHS.

Performance

DNL vs. DHS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DNL) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DNL having a 10.17% return and DHS slightly lower at 9.88%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DNL having a 9.17% annualized return and DHS not far ahead at 9.47%.

DNL

• 1D: -0.96%
• 1M: 3.92%
• YTD: 10.17%
• 6M: 11.58%
• 1Y: 19.16%
• 3Y*: 10.72%
• 5Y*: 4.00%
• 10Y*: 9.17%

DHS

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: -0.16%
• YTD: 9.88%
• 6M: 10.38%
• 1Y: 20.55%
• 3Y*: 16.39%
• 5Y*: 10.59%
• 10Y*: 9.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DNL vs. DHS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DNL WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund	10.17%	17.03%	-0.61%	17.00%	-22.38%	16.14%	18.22%	36.23%	-14.76%	31.11%
DHS WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund	9.88%	12.87%	18.02%	-0.19%	7.97%	23.20%	-5.70%	22.59%	-7.41%	11.69%

Correlation

The correlation between DNL and DHS is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2006	0.61

Over the past year, the correlation between DNL and DHS has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DNL vs. DHS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DNL	DHS
Technology	33.0%	3.7%
Consumer Cyclical	18.5%	5.0%
Industrials	16.3%	4.1%
Healthcare	10.6%	14.5%
Energy	6.5%	9.4%
Communication Services	6.2%	9.3%
Financial Services	4.0%	22.3%
Basic Materials	3.2%	1.2%
Consumer Defensive	1.2%	18.7%
Utilities	0.5%	9.0%
Real Estate	-	2.8%

Return for Risk

DNL vs. DHS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DNL

DNL Risk / Return Rank: 31
DNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
DNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
DNL Omega Ratio Rank: 28
DNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
DNL Martin Ratio Rank: 36

DHS

DHS Risk / Return Rank: 62
DHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
DHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
DHS Omega Ratio Rank: 57
DHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
DHS Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DNL vs. DHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DNL) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DNL	DHS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.08	2.06	-0.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.62	3.09	-1.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.35	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.55	3.28	-1.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.55	12.04	-6.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DNL vs. DHS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DNL Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is lower than the DHS Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DNL and DHS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DNL	DHS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.08	2.06	-0.99
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22	0.77	-0.55
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	0.59	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.41	-0.14

Drawdowns

DNL vs. DHS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DNL drawdown since its inception was -44.53%, smaller than the maximum DHS drawdown of -67.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNL and DHS.

Drawdown Indicators

	DNL	DHS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.53%	-67.25%	+22.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.42%	-6.30%	-6.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.15%	-11.87%	-8.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.85%	-15.28%	-19.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.85%	-37.35%	+2.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.96%	-2.60%	+1.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.17%	-9.55%	-0.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.46%	1.71%	+1.75%

Volatility

DNL vs. DHS - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DNL) has a higher volatility of 5.51% compared to WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) at 2.88%. This indicates that DNL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DNL	DHS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.51%	2.88%	+2.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.96%	7.32%	+7.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.90%	10.01%	+7.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.21%	13.89%	+4.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.65%	16.08%	+2.57%

DNL vs. DHS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DNL has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than DHS's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

DNL vs. DHS - Dividend Comparison

DNL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, less than DHS's 3.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DHS WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund	3.35%	3.32%	3.66%	4.31%	3.42%	3.29%	4.14%	3.69%	3.76%	3.00%	3.25%	3.53%
DNL WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund	1.66%	2.06%	2.30%	1.81%	4.82%	1.38%	1.76%	1.93%	2.55%	1.86%	2.51%	1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DNL and DHS in my portfolio?

DNL and DHS have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DNL or DHS?

DNL has higher volatility (5.51%) compared to DHS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DNL dropped -44.53% vs DHS's -67.25%.

Which ETF is better, DNL or DHS?

On 10-year performance, DHS leads with 9.47% vs 9.17% for DNL. On fees, DHS is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, DHS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DNL or DHS?

Over the 10-year period, DHS has performed better with a 9.47% return vs 9.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DNL or DHS?

DHS is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DNL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DNL or DHS?

DHS has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 1.66% for DNL.

What is the main difference between DNL and DHS?

DNL is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DHS is Large Cap Value Equities. DNL tracks WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index, while DHS tracks WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DNL and 0.38% for DHS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DHS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.