DNL vs. CIL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DNL) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL).

DNL and CIL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DNL is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. It was launched on Jun 16, 2006. CIL is a passively managed fund by Crestview that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Victory International 500 Volatility Weighted Index. It was launched on Aug 19, 2015. Both DNL and CIL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

DNL vs. CIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DNL) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DNL vs. CIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DNL WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund	-2.01%	17.03%	-0.61%	17.00%	-22.38%	16.14%	18.22%	36.23%	-14.76%	31.11%
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF	5.44%	32.99%	3.76%	16.29%	-16.00%	11.07%	7.21%	19.13%	-13.34%	27.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DNL achieves a -2.01% return, which is significantly lower than CIL's 5.44% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DNL having a 8.10% annualized return and CIL not far ahead at 8.47%.

DNL

• 1D: 3.65%
• 1M: -7.91%
• YTD: -2.01%
• 6M: 0.32%
• 1Y: 15.31%
• 3Y*: 6.44%
• 5Y*: 2.92%
• 10Y*: 8.10%

CIL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 5.44%
• 6M: 10.80%
• 1Y: 29.06%
• 3Y*: 16.16%
• 5Y*: 8.79%
• 10Y*: 8.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DNL vs. CIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DNL has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than CIL's 0.45% expense ratio.

DNL

WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund

CIL

VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF

Return for Risk

DNL vs. CIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DNL

DNL Risk / Return Rank: 45
DNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
DNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
DNL Omega Ratio Rank: 42
DNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
DNL Martin Ratio Rank: 46

CIL

CIL Risk / Return Rank: 92
CIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
CIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CIL Omega Ratio Rank: 96
CIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
CIL Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DNL vs. CIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DNL) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DNL	CIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.78	2.29	-1.51
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.22	3.15	-1.93
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.54	-0.38
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.16	2.32	-1.15
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.21	15.10	-10.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DNL vs. CIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DNL Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the CIL Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DNL and CIL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DNL	CIL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78	2.29	-1.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16	0.53	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44	0.49	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	0.44	-0.20

Correlation

The correlation between DNL and CIL is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

DNL vs. CIL - Dividend Comparison

DNL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, less than CIL's 2.38% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DNL WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund	1.87%	2.06%	2.30%	1.81%	4.82%	1.38%	1.76%	1.93%	2.55%	1.86%	2.51%	1.98%
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF	2.38%	2.70%	3.46%	2.91%	2.41%	3.04%	1.73%	2.69%	2.85%	2.17%	2.34%	0.43%

Drawdowns

DNL vs. CIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DNL drawdown since its inception was -44.53%, which is greater than CIL's maximum drawdown of -36.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNL and CIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	DNL	CIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.53%	-36.27%	-8.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.42%	-9.66%	-2.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.85%	-29.89%	-4.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.85%	-36.27%	+1.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.22%	-0.58%	-8.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.24%	-6.66%	-3.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.43%	1.73%	+1.70%

Volatility

DNL vs. CIL - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DNL) has a higher volatility of 9.11% compared to VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) at 0.00%. This indicates that DNL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DNL	CIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.11%	0.00%	+9.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.68%	5.76%	+7.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.69%	13.30%	+6.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.94%	16.67%	+1.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.52%	17.32%	+1.20%