DMXF vs. PABD

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DMXF (iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF) and PABD (iShares Paris-Aligned Climate MSCI World Ex USA ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds from iShares - DMXF tracks the MSCI EAFE Choice ESG Screened Index while PABD tracks the MSCI World ex USA Climate Paris Aligned Benchmark Extended Select Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, DMXF returned 19.96% vs 19.72% for PABD. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.12% expense ratio.

Performance

DMXF vs. PABD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF) and iShares Paris-Aligned Climate MSCI World Ex USA ETF (PABD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DMXF achieves a 11.78% return, which is significantly higher than PABD's 6.96% return.

DMXF

• 1D: -2.70%
• 1M: 1.22%
• YTD: 11.78%
• 6M: 10.88%
• 1Y: 19.96%
• 3Y*: 15.44%
• 5Y*: 6.99%
• 10Y*: —

PABD

• 1D: -1.88%
• 1M: 0.85%
• YTD: 6.96%
• 6M: 6.59%
• 1Y: 19.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DMXF vs. PABD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF	11.78%	22.07%	5.56%
PABD iShares Paris-Aligned Climate MSCI World Ex USA ETF	6.96%	30.06%	5.32%

Correlation

The correlation between DMXF and PABD is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2024	0.92

The correlation between DMXF and PABD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

DMXF vs. PABD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DMXF	PABD
Financial Services	31.8%	29.8%
Technology	21.3%	14.5%
Industrials	14.8%	15.7%
Healthcare	9.2%	11.4%
Communication Services	6.9%	3.1%
Basic Materials	4.9%	5.0%
Consumer Cyclical	4.3%	4.7%
Real Estate	2.9%	6.1%
Consumer Defensive	2.6%	4.7%
Utilities	0.7%	4.4%
Energy	-	0.2%

Return for Risk

DMXF vs. PABD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMXF

DMXF Risk / Return Rank: 36
DMXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
DMXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
DMXF Omega Ratio Rank: 34
DMXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
DMXF Martin Ratio Rank: 41

PABD

PABD Risk / Return Rank: 36
PABD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
PABD Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
PABD Omega Ratio Rank: 36
PABD Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
PABD Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMXF vs. PABD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF) and iShares Paris-Aligned Climate MSCI World Ex USA ETF (PABD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DMXF	PABD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.19	1.24	-0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.74	1.81	-0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.22	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.69	1.58	+0.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.32	5.90	+0.42

DMXF vs. PABD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DMXF Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the PABD Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DMXF and PABD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DMXF vs. PABD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMXF drawdown since its inception was -34.52%, which is greater than PABD's maximum drawdown of -13.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMXF and PABD.

Drawdown Indicators

	DMXF	PABD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.52%	-13.37%	-21.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.84%	-12.55%	+0.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.54%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.70%	-1.88%	-0.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.61%	-2.61%	-5.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.17%	3.35%	-0.18%

Volatility

DMXF vs. PABD - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF) has a higher volatility of 6.29% compared to iShares Paris-Aligned Climate MSCI World Ex USA ETF (PABD) at 5.21%. This indicates that DMXF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PABD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DMXF	PABD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.29%	5.21%	+1.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.41%	13.67%	+0.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.93%	16.03%	+0.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.83%	15.66%	+2.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.34%	15.66%	+1.68%

DMXF vs. PABD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DMXF and PABD have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

DMXF vs. PABD - Dividend Comparison

DMXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, more than PABD's 3.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF	4.26%	4.85%	2.92%	2.29%	2.37%	1.91%	0.31%
PABD iShares Paris-Aligned Climate MSCI World Ex USA ETF	3.05%	2.74%	2.87%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DMXF and PABD in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, DMXF and PABD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, DMXF or PABD?

DMXF has higher volatility (6.29%) compared to PABD (5.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMXF dropped -34.52% vs PABD's -13.37%.

Which ETF is better, DMXF or PABD?

On 1-year performance, DMXF leads with 19.96% vs 19.72% for PABD. Both ETFs have the same 0.12% expense ratio. On volatility, PABD has been the lower-risk option at 5.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DMXF or PABD?

Over the 1-year period, DMXF has performed better with a 19.96% return vs 19.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DMXF or PABD?

DMXF and PABD have the same expense ratio: 0.12% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DMXF or PABD?

DMXF has the higher dividend yield at 4.26%, compared with 3.05% for PABD.

What is the main difference between DMXF and PABD?

DMXF tracks MSCI EAFE Choice ESG Screened Index, while PABD tracks MSCI World ex USA Climate Paris Aligned Benchmark Extended Select Index - Benchmark TR Net.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PABD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.