PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DMXF vs. IBID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DMXF vs. IBID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DMXF achieves a 14.88% return, which is significantly higher than IBID's 1.99% return.


DMXF

1D
0.16%
1M
4.03%
YTD
14.88%
6M
14.42%
1Y
24.45%
3Y*
16.50%
5Y*
7.79%
10Y*

IBID

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
1.99%
6M
2.08%
1Y
4.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DMXF vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DMXF
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF
14.88%22.07%3.99%8.61%
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
1.99%5.66%4.71%2.61%

Correlation

The correlation between DMXF and IBID is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023

0.06

The correlation between DMXF and IBID shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DMXF vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMXF
DMXF Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
DMXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMXF Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
DMXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMXF Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

IBID
IBID Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
IBID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBID Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBID Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
IBID Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBID Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMXF vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DMXFIBIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.75

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

8.22

-6.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.75

30.99

-23.24

DMXF vs. IBID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DMXF Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the IBID Sharpe Ratio of 3.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DMXF and IBID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DMXF vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMXF drawdown since its inception was -34.52%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMXF and IBID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DMXFIBIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.52%

-1.28%

-33.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.84%

-0.49%

-11.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.49%

+0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.61%

-0.22%

-7.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

0.13%

+3.03%

Volatility

DMXF vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF) has a higher volatility of 5.58% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) at 0.35%. This indicates that DMXF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DMXFIBIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.58%

0.35%

+5.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.14%

0.86%

+13.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.74%

1.23%

+15.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.79%

2.24%

+15.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.31%

2.24%

+15.07%

DMXF vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison

DMXF has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DMXF vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison

DMXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, more than IBID's 3.68% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
DMXF
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF
4.15%4.85%2.92%2.29%2.37%1.91%0.31%
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
3.68%4.43%4.24%0.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DMXF and IBID have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DMXF has higher volatility (5.58%) compared to IBID (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMXF dropped -34.52% vs IBID's -1.28%.

On 1-year performance, DMXF leads with 24.45% vs 4.04% for IBID. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DMXF has performed better with a 24.45% return vs 4.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for DMXF.

DMXF has the higher dividend yield at 4.15%, compared with 3.68% for IBID.

DMXF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IBID is Inflation-Protected Bonds. DMXF tracks MSCI EAFE Choice ESG Screened Index, while IBID tracks ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for DMXF and 0.10% for IBID.

IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.29 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DMXF and IBID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer