PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DMXF vs. FIDI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DMXF vs. FIDI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF) and Fidelity International High Dividend ETF (FIDI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DMXF achieves a 13.19% return, which is significantly lower than FIDI's 15.58% return.


DMXF

1D
-0.66%
1M
-0.14%
6M
9.04%
YTD
13.19%
1Y
22.77%
3Y*
14.62%
5Y*
7.21%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.10%

FIDI

1D
-0.92%
1M
5.97%
6M
10.31%
YTD
15.58%
1Y
31.31%
3Y*
19.48%
5Y*
12.70%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.27M$15.45M$8.92M
$1.62M$1.95M$1.81M

DMXF vs. FIDI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DMXF
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF
13.19%22.07%3.99%20.52%-19.25%10.90%22.80%
FIDI
Fidelity International High Dividend ETF
15.58%39.34%-0.06%16.28%-4.73%16.87%12.15%

Correlation

The correlation between DMXF and FIDI is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2020

0.80

The correlation between DMXF and FIDI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DMXF vs. FIDI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DMXF
DMXF Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
DMXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMXF Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
DMXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMXF Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

FIDI
FIDI Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FIDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIDI Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FIDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIDI Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DMXF vs. FIDI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF) and Fidelity International High Dividend ETF (FIDI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DMXFFIDIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.48

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

4.51

-2.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.17

15.65

-8.48

DMXF vs. FIDI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DMXF Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the FIDI Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DMXF and FIDI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DMXF vs. FIDI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMXF drawdown since its inception was -34.52%, smaller than the maximum FIDI drawdown of -46.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMXF and FIDI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DMXFFIDIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.52%

-46.34%

+11.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.84%

-6.96%

-4.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.54%

-12.09%

-4.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.52%

-26.05%

-8.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.47%

-0.92%

-0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.51%

-9.63%

+2.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

2.00%

+1.14%

Volatility

DMXF vs. FIDI - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF) has a higher volatility of 5.40% compared to Fidelity International High Dividend ETF (FIDI) at 2.97%. This indicates that DMXF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIDI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DMXFFIDIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.40%

2.97%

+2.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.99%

9.31%

+5.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.34%

11.62%

+5.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.89%

14.81%

+3.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.34%

18.62%

-1.28%

DMXF vs. FIDI - Expense Ratio Comparison

DMXF has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than FIDI's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

DMXF vs. FIDI - Dividend Comparison

DMXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%, more than FIDI's 3.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DMXF
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF
4.21%4.85%2.92%2.29%2.37%1.91%0.31%0.00%0.00%
FIDI
Fidelity International High Dividend ETF
3.90%4.33%5.72%4.80%5.09%4.00%3.36%4.26%4.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


DMXF and FIDI have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DMXF has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to FIDI (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMXF dropped -34.52% vs FIDI's -46.34%.

On 5-year performance, FIDI leads with 12.70% vs 7.21% for DMXF. On fees, DMXF is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, FIDI has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FIDI has performed better with a 12.70% return vs 7.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DMXF is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FIDI.

DMXF has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 3.90% for FIDI.

DMXF tracks MSCI EAFE Choice ESG Screened Index, while FIDI tracks Fidelity® International High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for DMXF and 0.39% for FIDI.

FIDI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DMXF and FIDI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer