DMSFX vs. GFSYX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

DMSFX (Destinations Multi Strategy Alternatives Fund) and GFSYX (GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund) are both Multistrategy funds. Over the past 5 years, DMSFX returned 4.17%/yr vs 4.77%/yr for GFSYX. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.15% expense ratio.

Performance

DMSFX vs. GFSYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Destinations Multi Strategy Alternatives Fund (DMSFX) and GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund (GFSYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DMSFX achieves a 0.52% return, which is significantly higher than GFSYX's 0.45% return.

DMSFX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.58%
• YTD: 0.52%
• 6M: 0.92%
• 1Y: 4.70%
• 3Y*: 6.01%
• 5Y*: 4.17%
• 10Y*: —

GFSYX

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: 1.46%
• YTD: 0.45%
• 6M: 0.98%
• 1Y: 3.13%
• 3Y*: 5.87%
• 5Y*: 4.77%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DMSFX vs. GFSYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DMSFX Destinations Multi Strategy Alternatives Fund	0.52%	3.65%	6.40%	12.82%	-3.45%	5.22%	10.01%	8.93%	-4.99%	1.16%
GFSYX GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund	0.45%	5.49%	7.60%	5.98%	-0.57%	4.96%	-0.17%	4.94%	0.14%	1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between DMSFX and GFSYX is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.11
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2017	0.16

The correlation between DMSFX and GFSYX shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (5 years) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DMSFX vs. GFSYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMSFX

DMSFX Risk / Return Rank: 34
DMSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
DMSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
DMSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
DMSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
DMSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

GFSYX

GFSYX Risk / Return Rank: 24
GFSYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
GFSYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
GFSYX Omega Ratio Rank: 21
GFSYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
GFSYX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMSFX vs. GFSYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Destinations Multi Strategy Alternatives Fund (DMSFX) and GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund (GFSYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DMSFX	GFSYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	1.29	+0.49
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.65	1.88	+0.77
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.24	+0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.95	2.42	-0.47
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.88	5.13	+0.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DMSFX vs. GFSYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DMSFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the GFSYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DMSFX and GFSYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DMSFX	GFSYX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.79	1.29	+0.49
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.15	1.31	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.88	0.90	-0.02

Drawdowns

DMSFX vs. GFSYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMSFX drawdown since its inception was -21.11%, which is greater than GFSYX's maximum drawdown of -9.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMSFX and GFSYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DMSFX	GFSYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.11%	-9.54%	-11.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.47%	-1.39%	-1.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.02%	-4.49%	-0.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-6.84%	-4.49%	-2.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.35%	0.00%	-0.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.60%	-0.91%	-0.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.82%	0.65%	+0.17%

Volatility

DMSFX vs. GFSYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Destinations Multi Strategy Alternatives Fund (DMSFX) is 0.47%, while GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund (GFSYX) has a volatility of 0.83%. This indicates that DMSFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GFSYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DMSFX	GFSYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.47%	0.83%	-0.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.69%	1.93%	-0.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.77%	2.53%	+0.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.68%	3.66%	+0.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.03%	3.71%	+1.32%

DMSFX vs. GFSYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DMSFX and GFSYX have an expense ratio of 1.15%.

Dividends

DMSFX vs. GFSYX - Dividend Comparison

DMSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, less than GFSYX's 7.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DMSFX Destinations Multi Strategy Alternatives Fund	3.73%	3.42%	6.41%	6.62%	3.05%	4.68%	1.48%	4.64%	4.31%	2.00%
GFSYX GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund	7.14%	7.18%	8.54%	13.00%	4.20%	1.59%	1.53%	2.24%	2.17%	0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DMSFX and GFSYX in my portfolio?

DMSFX and GFSYX have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DMSFX or GFSYX?

GFSYX has higher volatility (0.83%) compared to DMSFX (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMSFX dropped -21.11% vs GFSYX's -9.54%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DMSFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.