GFSYX vs. MAFIX
Compare and contrast key facts about GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund (GFSYX) and Abbey Capital Multi Asset Fund Class I (MAFIX).
GFSYX is managed by GuideStone Funds. It was launched on Jun 29, 2017. MAFIX is managed by Abbey Capital. It was launched on Apr 11, 2018.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GFSYX or MAFIX.
Key characteristics
GFSYX | MAFIX | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 6.95% | 8.39% |
1Y Return | -1.60% | 10.54% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 0.26% | 5.23% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 0.72% | 11.61% |
Sharpe Ratio | -0.19 | 0.79 |
Sortino Ratio | -0.15 | 1.13 |
Omega Ratio | 0.93 | 1.15 |
Calmar Ratio | -0.18 | 0.82 |
Martin Ratio | -0.28 | 2.30 |
Ulcer Index | 5.29% | 4.67% |
Daily Std Dev | 8.09% | 13.55% |
Max Drawdown | -10.03% | -13.28% |
Current Drawdown | -1.69% | -5.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between GFSYX and MAFIX is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
GFSYX vs. MAFIX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, GFSYX achieves a 6.95% return, which is significantly lower than MAFIX's 8.39% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GFSYX vs. MAFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GFSYX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than MAFIX's 1.79% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GFSYX vs. MAFIX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund (GFSYX) and Abbey Capital Multi Asset Fund Class I (MAFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GFSYX vs. MAFIX - Dividend Comparison
GFSYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, more than MAFIX's 0.91% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund | 3.83% | 4.09% | 0.44% | 0.19% | 1.38% | 1.86% | 1.83% | 0.54% |
Abbey Capital Multi Asset Fund Class I | 0.91% | 0.99% | 3.84% | 3.04% | 1.64% | 10.10% | 9.36% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GFSYX vs. MAFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GFSYX drawdown since its inception was -10.03%, smaller than the maximum MAFIX drawdown of -13.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFSYX and MAFIX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GFSYX vs. MAFIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund (GFSYX) is 0.98%, while Abbey Capital Multi Asset Fund Class I (MAFIX) has a volatility of 4.15%. This indicates that GFSYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.