DMAY vs. FDL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DMAY (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May) and FDL (First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - DMAY is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect May Series Index, while FDL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DMAY returned 7.16%/yr vs 12.51%/yr for FDL. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DMAY charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FDL.

Performance

DMAY vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DMAY achieves a 4.42% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 13.33% return.

DMAY

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: 1.30%
• YTD: 4.42%
• 6M: 5.19%
• 1Y: 12.37%
• 3Y*: 11.96%
• 5Y*: 7.16%
• 10Y*: —

FDL

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -0.26%
• YTD: 13.33%
• 6M: 14.76%
• 1Y: 23.67%
• 3Y*: 18.97%
• 5Y*: 12.51%
• 10Y*: 11.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DMAY vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May	4.42%	11.05%	12.82%	15.40%	-9.98%	6.14%	6.40%
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund	13.33%	14.79%	17.98%	2.94%	6.66%	26.10%	24.55%

Correlation

The correlation between DMAY and FDL is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.37
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2020	0.52

Over the past year, the correlation between DMAY and FDL has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DMAY vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DMAY	FDL
Technology	36.2%	1.1%
Financial Services	11.9%	15.1%
Communication Services	10.9%	10.6%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	3.8%
Healthcare	8.4%	16.8%
Industrials	8.1%	3.8%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	14.7%
Energy	3.5%	27.3%
Utilities	2.3%	6.5%
Real Estate	1.9%	-
Basic Materials	1.8%	0.3%

Return for Risk

DMAY vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMAY

DMAY Risk / Return Rank: 85
DMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
DMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
DMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 91
DMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
DMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 92

FDL

FDL Risk / Return Rank: 70
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 59
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMAY vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DMAY	FDL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.65	2.11	+0.55
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.00	3.25	+0.75
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.60	1.37	+0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.73	5.56	-1.84
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	22.76	13.56	+9.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DMAY vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DMAY Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is comparable to the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DMAY and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DMAY	FDL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.65	2.11	+0.55
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80	0.88	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.66	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.88	0.45	+0.42

Drawdowns

DMAY vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMAY drawdown since its inception was -13.90%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMAY and FDL.

Drawdown Indicators

	DMAY	FDL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.90%	-65.93%	+52.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.36%	-4.27%	+0.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.38%	-12.24%	-0.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.90%	-16.46%	+2.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.30%	-2.18%	+1.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.24%	-9.66%	+7.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.55%	1.75%	-1.20%

Volatility

DMAY vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) is 0.84%, while First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) has a volatility of 2.85%. This indicates that DMAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DMAY	FDL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.84%	2.85%	-2.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.74%	7.87%	-4.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.73%	11.28%	-6.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.02%	14.31%	-5.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.43%	17.11%	-8.68%

DMAY vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DMAY has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

DMAY vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

DMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund	3.68%	4.04%	4.96%	4.58%	3.58%	4.59%	4.48%	3.75%	3.97%	3.18%	2.93%	3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DMAY and FDL in my portfolio?

DMAY and FDL have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DMAY or FDL?

FDL has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to DMAY (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMAY dropped -13.90% vs FDL's -65.93%.

Which ETF is better, DMAY or FDL?

On 5-year performance, FDL leads with 12.51% vs 7.16% for DMAY. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, DMAY has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DMAY or FDL?

Over the 5-year period, FDL has performed better with a 12.51% return vs 7.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DMAY or FDL?

FDL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DMAY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DMAY or FDL?

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 0.00% for DMAY.

What is the main difference between DMAY and FDL?

DMAY is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. DMAY tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect May Series Index, while FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DMAY and 0.45% for FDL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.