DMAGX vs. COBYX
Compare and contrast key facts about Driehaus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (DMAGX) and The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX).
DMAGX is managed by Driehaus. It was launched on Apr 6, 2017. COBYX is managed by Cook & Bynum. It was launched on Jun 30, 2009.
Performance
DMAGX vs. COBYX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DMAGX vs. COBYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMAGX Driehaus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund | -0.30% | 22.77% | 26.16% | 19.48% | -18.85% | -1.84% | 30.20% | 21.64% | -13.22% | 21.16% |
COBYX The Cook & Bynum Fund | 3.01% | 20.50% | -10.32% | 16.73% | 9.28% | 9.05% | -10.97% | 9.40% | -13.40% | 8.03% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DMAGX achieves a -0.30% return, which is significantly lower than COBYX's 3.01% return.
DMAGX
- 1D
- 3.22%
- 1M
- -5.98%
- YTD
- -0.30%
- 6M
- 0.36%
- 1Y
- 26.80%
- 3Y*
- 20.39%
- 5Y*
- 7.60%
- 10Y*
- —
COBYX
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- -3.87%
- YTD
- 3.01%
- 6M
- 7.66%
- 1Y
- 7.10%
- 3Y*
- 7.06%
- 5Y*
- 7.72%
- 10Y*
- 3.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DMAGX vs. COBYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DMAGX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than COBYX's 1.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DMAGX vs. COBYX — Risk / Return Rank
DMAGX
COBYX
DMAGX vs. COBYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Driehaus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (DMAGX) and The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DMAGX | COBYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.54 | 0.62 | +0.92 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.15 | 0.92 | +1.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.14 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | 1.05 | +1.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.31 | 3.15 | +6.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DMAGX | COBYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.54 | 0.62 | +0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.56 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.35 | +0.33 |
Correlation
The correlation between DMAGX and COBYX is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
DMAGX vs. COBYX - Dividend Comparison
DMAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.03%, more than COBYX's 1.14% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMAGX Driehaus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund | 14.03% | 13.99% | 8.34% | 1.45% | 2.08% | 4.57% | 2.34% | 1.15% | 0.84% | 4.91% | 0.00% |
COBYX The Cook & Bynum Fund | 1.14% | 1.18% | 0.00% | 1.01% | 1.16% | 2.18% | 0.32% | 0.69% | 12.60% | 1.88% | 5.09% |
Drawdowns
DMAGX vs. COBYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DMAGX drawdown since its inception was -34.21%, roughly equal to the maximum COBYX drawdown of -34.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMAGX and COBYX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DMAGX | COBYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.21% | -34.18% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.80% | -8.95% | -1.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.38% | -17.10% | -14.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.29% | -6.21% | -1.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.99% | -6.86% | -3.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.70% | 2.99% | -0.29% |
Volatility
DMAGX vs. COBYX - Volatility Comparison
Driehaus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (DMAGX) has a higher volatility of 7.36% compared to The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX) at 5.20%. This indicates that DMAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COBYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DMAGX | COBYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.36% | 5.20% | +2.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.77% | 8.42% | +3.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.94% | 14.59% | +3.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.01% | 13.98% | +1.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.43% | 13.55% | +1.88% |