PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DMAGX vs. DRESX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DMAGX vs. DRESX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Driehaus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (DMAGX) and Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund (DRESX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DMAGX achieves a 13.58% return, which is significantly higher than DRESX's 2.62% return.


DMAGX

1D
3.04%
1M
-3.65%
6M
9.27%
YTD
13.58%
1Y
23.16%
3Y*
22.17%
5Y*
10.65%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.64%

DRESX

1D
1.70%
1M
-9.97%
6M
-5.73%
YTD
2.62%
1Y
15.90%
3Y*
12.52%
5Y*
5.18%
10Y*
8.92%
ALL TIME*
7.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DMAGX vs. DRESX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DMAGX
Driehaus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund
13.58%22.77%26.16%19.48%-18.85%-1.84%30.20%21.64%-13.22%21.16%
DRESX
Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund
2.62%24.08%14.86%10.30%-21.17%15.93%33.56%33.70%-24.00%20.02%

Correlation

The correlation between DMAGX and DRESX is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2017

0.80

The correlation between DMAGX and DRESX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (3 years) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DMAGX vs. DRESX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DMAGX
DMAGX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
DMAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
DMAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

DRESX
DRESX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
DRESX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRESX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRESX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
DRESX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRESX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DMAGX vs. DRESX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Driehaus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (DMAGX) and Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund (DRESX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DMAGXDRESXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.16

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

0.75

+1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.21

2.74

+4.46

DMAGX vs. DRESX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DMAGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is higher than the DRESX Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DMAGX and DRESX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DMAGX vs. DRESX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMAGX drawdown since its inception was -34.21%, roughly equal to the maximum DRESX drawdown of -33.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMAGX and DRESX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DMAGXDRESXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.21%

-33.38%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.18%

-20.40%

+10.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.03%

-20.40%

+2.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.34%

-25.88%

-3.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.36%

-19.05%

+12.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.71%

-9.91%

+0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

5.52%

-2.52%

Volatility

DMAGX vs. DRESX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Driehaus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (DMAGX) is 5.53%, while Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund (DRESX) has a volatility of 7.19%. This indicates that DMAGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRESX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DMAGXDRESXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.53%

7.19%

-1.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.50%

16.63%

-2.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.10%

18.51%

-1.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.51%

15.41%

+0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.62%

16.23%

-0.61%

DMAGX vs. DRESX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DMAGX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than DRESX's 1.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

DMAGX vs. DRESX - Dividend Comparison

DMAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.32%, more than DRESX's 2.19% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DMAGX
Driehaus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund
12.32%13.99%8.34%1.45%2.08%4.57%2.34%1.15%0.84%4.91%
DRESX
Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund
2.19%2.25%0.68%1.09%0.00%0.04%0.65%0.41%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DMAGX and DRESX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRESX has higher volatility (7.19%) compared to DMAGX (5.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMAGX dropped -34.21% vs DRESX's -33.38%.

DMAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DMAGX and DRESX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer