PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DMAGX vs. DREGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DMAGX vs. DREGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Driehaus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (DMAGX) and Driehaus Emerging Markets Growth Fund (DREGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DMAGX achieves a 21.30% return, which is significantly lower than DREGX's 31.87% return.


DMAGX

1D
0.15%
1M
3.79%
YTD
21.30%
6M
20.23%
1Y
36.96%
3Y*
26.99%
5Y*
11.12%
10Y*

DREGX

1D
0.40%
1M
6.97%
YTD
31.87%
6M
33.28%
1Y
58.21%
3Y*
24.74%
5Y*
8.26%
10Y*
11.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DMAGX vs. DREGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DMAGX
Driehaus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund
21.30%22.77%26.16%19.48%-18.85%-1.84%30.20%21.64%-13.22%21.16%
DREGX
Driehaus Emerging Markets Growth Fund
31.87%29.95%7.40%11.26%-22.54%-1.95%27.36%25.34%-16.26%27.61%

Correlation

The correlation between DMAGX and DREGX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2017

0.90

The correlation between DMAGX and DREGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (3 years) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DMAGX vs. DREGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMAGX
DMAGX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
DMAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
DMAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

DREGX
DREGX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
DREGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DREGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
DREGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
DREGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DREGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMAGX vs. DREGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Driehaus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (DMAGX) and Driehaus Emerging Markets Growth Fund (DREGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DMAGXDREGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.54

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.77

4.31

-0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.02

15.78

-0.77

DMAGX vs. DREGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DMAGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the DREGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DMAGX and DREGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DMAGX vs. DREGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMAGX drawdown since its inception was -34.21%, smaller than the maximum DREGX drawdown of -65.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMAGX and DREGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DMAGXDREGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.21%

-65.44%

+31.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.18%

-13.82%

+3.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.03%

-17.47%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.38%

-36.41%

+5.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.77%

-17.37%

+7.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

3.76%

-1.21%

Volatility

DMAGX vs. DREGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Driehaus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (DMAGX) is 6.39%, while Driehaus Emerging Markets Growth Fund (DREGX) has a volatility of 10.55%. This indicates that DMAGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DREGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DMAGXDREGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.39%

10.55%

-4.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.44%

18.35%

-4.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.02%

20.93%

-4.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.39%

19.74%

-4.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.56%

18.87%

-3.31%

DMAGX vs. DREGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DMAGX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than DREGX's 1.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

DMAGX vs. DREGX - Dividend Comparison

DMAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.54%, more than DREGX's 1.28% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DMAGX
Driehaus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund
11.54%13.99%8.34%1.45%2.08%4.57%2.34%1.15%0.84%4.91%
DREGX
Driehaus Emerging Markets Growth Fund
1.28%1.69%0.89%1.81%0.75%16.71%2.48%0.82%4.33%0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


DMAGX and DREGX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DREGX has higher volatility (10.55%) compared to DMAGX (6.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMAGX dropped -34.21% vs DREGX's -65.44%.

DREGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DMAGX and DREGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer