DLNV vs. KNG
DLNV (FT Vest U.S. Equity Dual Directional Buffer ETF - November) and KNG (FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DLNV is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), while KNG is a Dividend fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series. Both are passively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DLNV charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for KNG.
Performance
DLNV vs. KNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DLNV achieves a 5.60% return, which is significantly lower than KNG's 7.18% return.
DLNV
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 5.60%
- 6M
- 5.25%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KNG
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 4.85%
- YTD
- 7.18%
- 6M
- 6.55%
- 1Y
- 11.94%
- 3Y*
- 7.25%
- 5Y*
- 5.65%
- 10Y*
- —
DLNV vs. KNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DLNV FT Vest U.S. Equity Dual Directional Buffer ETF - November | 5.60% | 1.88% |
KNG FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF | 7.18% | 1.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between DLNV and KNG is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2025 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DLNV vs. KNG — Risk / Return Rank
DLNV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
KNG
DLNV vs. KNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Dual Directional Buffer ETF - November (DLNV) and FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DLNV | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.20 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.39 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.49 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DLNV vs. KNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DLNV drawdown since its inception was -4.83%, smaller than the maximum KNG drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLNV and KNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DLNV | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.83% | -35.12% | +30.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.30% | +1.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.64% | -4.12% | +3.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.42% | — |
Volatility
DLNV vs. KNG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DLNV | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.18% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.71% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.08% | 10.40% | -3.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.08% | 13.59% | -6.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.08% | 17.14% | -10.06% |
DLNV vs. KNG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DLNV has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than KNG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
DLNV vs. KNG - Dividend Comparison
DLNV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.32%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLNV FT Vest U.S. Equity Dual Directional Buffer ETF - November | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KNG FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF | 8.32% | 8.61% | 9.08% | 5.91% | 4.00% | 3.45% | 3.62% | 4.09% | 3.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DLNV and KNG have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DLNV.
KNG has the higher dividend yield at 8.32%, compared with 0.00% for DLNV.
DLNV is categorized as Defined Outcome, while KNG is Dividend. DLNV tracks SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), while KNG tracks Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DLNV and 0.75% for KNG.
Find the right allocation for DLNV and KNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer