DLNV vs. UXJL
DLNV (FT Vest U.S. Equity Dual Directional Buffer ETF - November) and UXJL (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July) are both Defined Outcome funds from First Trust. DLNV is passively managed, while UXJL is actively managed. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.85% expense ratio.
Performance
DLNV vs. UXJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DLNV achieves a 5.60% return, which is significantly lower than UXJL's 10.60% return.
DLNV
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 5.60%
- 6M
- 5.25%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UXJL
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- 10.60%
- 6M
- 9.70%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DLNV vs. UXJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DLNV FT Vest U.S. Equity Dual Directional Buffer ETF - November | 5.60% | 1.88% |
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July | 10.60% | 3.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between DLNV and UXJL is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2025 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DLNV vs. UXJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Dual Directional Buffer ETF - November (DLNV) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DLNV vs. UXJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DLNV drawdown since its inception was -4.83%, smaller than the maximum UXJL drawdown of -10.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLNV and UXJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DLNV | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.83% | -10.29% | +5.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.81% | +1.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.64% | -1.62% | +0.98% |
Volatility
DLNV vs. UXJL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DLNV | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.08% | 14.58% | -7.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.08% | 14.58% | -7.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.08% | 14.58% | -7.50% |
DLNV vs. UXJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DLNV and UXJL have an expense ratio of 0.85%.
Dividends
DLNV vs. UXJL - Dividend Comparison
Neither DLNV nor UXJL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, DLNV and UXJL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DLNV and UXJL have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.
DLNV and UXJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Find the right allocation for DLNV and UXJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer