DLN vs. RFDA
DLN (WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF) and RFDA (RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. DLN is passively managed, while RFDA is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DLN returned 12.22%/yr vs 13.17%/yr for RFDA. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DLN charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for RFDA.
Performance
DLN vs. RFDA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DLN achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly lower than RFDA's 11.40% return.
DLN
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 2.93%
- YTD
- 9.93%
- 6M
- 9.96%
- 1Y
- 22.38%
- 3Y*
- 18.35%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- 12.68%
RFDA
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 4.27%
- YTD
- 11.40%
- 6M
- 12.25%
- 1Y
- 29.49%
- 3Y*
- 19.19%
- 5Y*
- 13.17%
- 10Y*
- —
DLN vs. RFDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLN WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF | 9.93% | 15.53% | 19.66% | 9.95% | -3.78% | 25.60% | 4.59% | 28.91% | -5.82% | 18.22% |
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF | 11.40% | 16.42% | 20.12% | 16.98% | -8.58% | 25.94% | 11.26% | 27.15% | -9.27% | 19.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between DLN and RFDA is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2016 | 0.87 |
The correlation between DLN and RFDA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
DLN vs. RFDA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DLN
RFDA
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Industrials
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
DLN
RFDA
Financial Services
DLN
RFDA
Healthcare
DLN
RFDA
Consumer Defensive
DLN
RFDA
Energy
DLN
RFDA
Industrials
DLN
RFDA
Communication Services
DLN
RFDA
Utilities
DLN
RFDA
Consumer Cyclical
DLN
RFDA
Real Estate
DLN
RFDA
Basic Materials
DLN
RFDA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DLN vs. RFDA — Risk / Return Rank
DLN
RFDA
DLN vs. RFDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN) and RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DLN | RFDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.47 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.69 | 5.44 | -1.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.59 | 19.87 | -4.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DLN | RFDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53 | 2.55 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 | 0.84 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.79 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
DLN vs. RFDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DLN drawdown since its inception was -57.84%, which is greater than RFDA's maximum drawdown of -34.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLN and RFDA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DLN | RFDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.84% | -34.60% | -23.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.10% | -5.45% | -0.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.71% | -19.35% | +5.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.26% | -19.35% | +3.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -0.92% | +0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.52% | -3.74% | -3.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.44% | 1.49% | -0.05% |
Volatility
DLN vs. RFDA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN) is 2.17%, while RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) has a volatility of 2.66%. This indicates that DLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RFDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DLN | RFDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.17% | 2.66% | -0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.77% | 8.47% | -1.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.87% | 11.64% | -2.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.26% | 15.73% | -2.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.16% | 16.85% | -0.69% |
DLN vs. RFDA - Expense Ratio Comparison
DLN has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than RFDA's 0.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
DLN vs. RFDA - Dividend Comparison
DLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, more than RFDA's 1.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLN WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF | 1.79% | 1.90% | 2.00% | 2.43% | 2.53% | 2.01% | 2.66% | 2.51% | 2.90% | 2.33% | 2.64% | 2.80% |
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF | 1.77% | 1.89% | 2.23% | 2.68% | 3.57% | 1.44% | 1.62% | 1.87% | 2.44% | 1.90% | 0.98% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DLN and RFDA have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RFDA has higher volatility (2.66%) compared to DLN (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLN dropped -57.84% vs RFDA's -34.60%.
On 5-year performance, RFDA leads with 13.17% vs 12.22% for DLN. On fees, DLN is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DLN has been the lower-risk option at 2.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, RFDA has performed better with a 13.17% return vs 12.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DLN is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for RFDA.
DLN has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 1.77% for RFDA.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for DLN and 0.52% for RFDA.
RFDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DLN and RFDA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer