DLN vs. IQM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DLN (WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF) and IQM (Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. DLN is passively managed, while IQM is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DLN returned 12.22%/yr vs 22.22%/yr for IQM. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DLN charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for IQM.

Performance

DLN vs. IQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLN achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly lower than IQM's 40.18% return.

DLN

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: 2.93%
• YTD: 9.93%
• 6M: 9.96%
• 1Y: 22.38%
• 3Y*: 18.35%
• 5Y*: 12.22%
• 10Y*: 12.68%

IQM

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 11.94%
• YTD: 40.18%
• 6M: 38.57%
• 1Y: 75.07%
• 3Y*: 37.62%
• 5Y*: 22.22%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DLN vs. IQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DLN WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF	9.93%	15.53%	19.66%	9.95%	-3.78%	25.60%	15.84%
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF	40.18%	30.76%	31.03%	41.06%	-33.36%	25.18%	78.48%

Correlation

The correlation between DLN and IQM is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2020	0.62

The correlation between DLN and IQM shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DLN vs. IQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DLN	IQM
Technology	20.1%	65.9%
Financial Services	18.0%	-
Healthcare	12.6%	1.1%
Consumer Defensive	9.3%	-
Energy	8.5%	2.7%
Industrials	7.9%	19.9%
Communication Services	7.8%	2.1%
Utilities	5.9%	3.3%
Consumer Cyclical	5.0%	4.1%
Real Estate	4.0%	-
Basic Materials	1.0%	-

Return for Risk

DLN vs. IQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DLN

DLN Risk / Return Rank: 77
DLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
DLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
DLN Omega Ratio Rank: 75
DLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
DLN Martin Ratio Rank: 79

IQM

IQM Risk / Return Rank: 78
IQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
IQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
IQM Omega Ratio Rank: 71
IQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
IQM Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DLN vs. IQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DLN	IQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.53	2.67	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.64	3.11	+0.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.43	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.69	5.13	-1.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.59	16.79	-1.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DLN vs. IQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLN Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the IQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLN and IQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DLN	IQM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.53	2.67	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93	0.77	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	0.96	-0.43

Drawdowns

DLN vs. IQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLN drawdown since its inception was -57.84%, which is greater than IQM's maximum drawdown of -44.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLN and IQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	DLN	IQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.84%	-44.91%	-12.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.10%	-14.71%	+8.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.71%	-30.42%	+16.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.26%	-44.91%	+28.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.51%	-0.37%	-0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.52%	-12.25%	+4.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.44%	4.49%	-3.05%

Volatility

DLN vs. IQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN) is 2.17%, while Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) has a volatility of 9.20%. This indicates that DLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DLN	IQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.17%	9.20%	-7.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.77%	22.92%	-16.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.87%	28.27%	-19.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.26%	28.91%	-15.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.16%	30.72%	-14.56%

DLN vs. IQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DLN has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than IQM's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

DLN vs. IQM - Dividend Comparison

DLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, while IQM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DLN WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF	1.79%	1.90%	2.00%	2.43%	2.53%	2.01%	2.66%	2.51%	2.90%	2.33%	2.64%	2.80%
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.17%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DLN and IQM in my portfolio?

DLN and IQM have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DLN or IQM?

IQM has higher volatility (9.20%) compared to DLN (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLN dropped -57.84% vs IQM's -44.91%.

Which ETF is better, DLN or IQM?

On 5-year performance, IQM leads with 22.22% vs 12.22% for DLN. On fees, DLN is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DLN has been the lower-risk option at 2.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DLN or IQM?

Over the 5-year period, IQM has performed better with a 22.22% return vs 12.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DLN or IQM?

DLN is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IQM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DLN or IQM?

DLN has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.00% for IQM.

What is the main difference between DLN and IQM?

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for DLN and 0.50% for IQM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.