DLLL vs. MSFL

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

DLLL (GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF) and MSFL (GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from GraniteShares. DLLL is passively managed, while MSFL is actively managed. Over the past year, DLLL returned 526.11% vs -33.16% for MSFL. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. DLLL charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for MSFL.

Performance

DLLL vs. MSFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL) and GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLLL achieves a 615.57% return, which is significantly higher than MSFL's -18.68% return.

DLLL

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: -0.53%
• 6M: 775.99%
• YTD: 615.57%
• 1Y: 526.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 275.30%

MSFL

• 1D: 5.79%
• 1M: 37.76%
• 6M: 5.09%
• YTD: -18.68%
• 1Y: -33.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -5.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DLLL GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF	$23.39M	$34.88M	$51.04M
MSFL GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF	$37.77M	$32.36M	$34.28M

DLLL vs. MSFL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DLLL GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF	615.57%	-3.72%
MSFL GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF	-18.68%	26.40%

Correlation

The correlation between DLLL and MSFL is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025	0.26

The correlation between DLLL and MSFL shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DLLL vs. MSFL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DLLL	MSFL
Technology	66.6%	66.7%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

DLLL vs. MSFL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DLLL

DLLL Risk / Return Rank: 94
DLLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
DLLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
DLLL Omega Ratio Rank: 91
DLLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
DLLL Martin Ratio Rank: 92

MSFL

MSFL Risk / Return Rank: 5
MSFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
MSFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
MSFL Omega Ratio Rank: 5
MSFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
MSFL Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DLLL vs. MSFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL) and GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DLLL	MSFL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.40	-0.57	+3.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.57	-0.59	+4.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	0.93	+0.50
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.37	-0.57	+8.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.29	-0.95	+17.24

DLLL vs. MSFL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLLL Sharpe Ratio is 3.40, which is higher than the MSFL Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLLL and MSFL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DLLL vs. MSFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLLL drawdown since its inception was -68.58%, which is greater than MSFL's maximum drawdown of -62.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLLL and MSFL.

Drawdown Indicators

	DLLL	MSFL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.58%	-62.08%	-6.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-57.19%	-62.08%	+4.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.31%	-36.63%	+4.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.81%	-23.68%	-2.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.32%	37.31%	-7.99%

Volatility

DLLL vs. MSFL - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL) has a higher volatility of 52.08% compared to GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) at 29.71%. This indicates that DLLL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DLLL	MSFL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	52.08%	29.71%	+22.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	114.38%	51.38%	+63.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	140.57%	63.24%	+77.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	132.69%	54.34%	+78.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	132.69%	54.34%	+78.35%

DLLL vs. MSFL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DLLL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MSFL's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

DLLL vs. MSFL - Dividend Comparison

Neither DLLL nor MSFL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DLLL and MSFL in my portfolio?

DLLL and MSFL have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DLLL or MSFL?

DLLL has higher volatility (52.08%) compared to MSFL (29.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLLL dropped -68.58% vs MSFL's -62.08%.

Which ETF is better, DLLL or MSFL?

On 1-year performance, DLLL leads with 526.11% vs -33.16% for MSFL. On fees, MSFL is cheaper at 1.15% per year. On volatility, MSFL has been the lower-risk option at 29.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DLLL or MSFL?

Over the 1-year period, DLLL has performed better with a 526.11% return vs -33.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DLLL or MSFL?

MSFL is cheaper with a 1.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DLLL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DLLL or MSFL?

DLLL and MSFL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between DLLL and MSFL?

Their fees differ too: 1.50% for DLLL and 1.15% for MSFL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DLLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.40 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.