DLFE vs. FDL
DLFE (FT Vest U.S. Equity Dual Directional Buffer ETF - February) and FDL (First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - DLFE is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), while FDL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. DLFE charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FDL.
Performance
DLFE vs. FDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DLFE
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDL
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 1.25%
- YTD
- 14.42%
- 6M
- 15.89%
- 1Y
- 25.91%
- 3Y*
- 19.36%
- 5Y*
- 12.73%
- 10Y*
- 11.25%
DLFE vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DLFE FT Vest U.S. Equity Dual Directional Buffer ETF - February | 4.27% |
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | -0.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between DLFE and FDL is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2026 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DLFE vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank
DLFE
FDL
DLFE vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Dual Directional Buffer ETF - February (DLFE) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DLFE | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.98 | 0.45 | +1.53 |
Drawdowns
DLFE vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DLFE drawdown since its inception was -5.03%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLFE and FDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DLFE | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.03% | -65.93% | +60.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.88% | -1.24% | +0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.98% | -9.65% | +8.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.75% | — |
Volatility
DLFE vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DLFE | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.84% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.78% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.01% | 11.27% | -3.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.01% | 14.31% | -6.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.01% | 17.11% | -9.10% |
DLFE vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
DLFE has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
DLFE vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison
DLFE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLFE FT Vest U.S. Equity Dual Directional Buffer ETF - February | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 3.64% | 4.04% | 4.96% | 4.58% | 3.58% | 4.59% | 4.48% | 3.75% | 3.97% | 3.18% | 2.93% | 3.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DLFE and FDL have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FDL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DLFE.
FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.64%, compared with 0.00% for DLFE.
DLFE is categorized as Defined Outcome, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. DLFE tracks SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), while FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DLFE and 0.45% for FDL.
Find the right allocation for DLFE and FDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer