DJUN vs. MNZL
DJUN (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June) and MNZL (Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DJUN is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect June Series Index, while MNZL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell IdealRatings Manzil Halal USA Broad Market Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DJUN charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for MNZL.
Performance
DJUN vs. MNZL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DJUN achieves a 4.07% return, which is significantly lower than MNZL's 15.74% return.
DJUN
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- 6M
- 3.55%
- YTD
- 4.07%
- 1Y
- 8.83%
- 3Y*
- 10.47%
- 5Y*
- 8.01%
- 10Y*
- —
MNZL
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- 6M
- 13.37%
- YTD
- 15.74%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DJUN vs. MNZL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June | 4.07% | 2.11% |
MNZL Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF | 15.74% | 3.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between DJUN and MNZL is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DJUN vs. MNZL — Risk / Return Rank
DJUN
MNZL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DJUN vs. MNZL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June (DJUN) and Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF (MNZL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DJUN | MNZL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.84 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.07 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DJUN vs. MNZL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DJUN drawdown since its inception was -11.96%, which is greater than MNZL's maximum drawdown of -9.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJUN and MNZL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DJUN | MNZL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.96% | -9.66% | -2.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.15% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | -3.52% | +2.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.56% | -1.86% | +0.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.52% | — | — |
Volatility
DJUN vs. MNZL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DJUN | MNZL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.50% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.77% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.54% | 16.90% | -12.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.53% | 16.90% | -8.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.00% | 16.90% | -8.90% |
DJUN vs. MNZL - Expense Ratio Comparison
DJUN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than MNZL's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
DJUN vs. MNZL - Dividend Comparison
DJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MNZL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
DJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MNZL Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF | 0.03% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DJUN and MNZL have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MNZL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MNZL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DJUN.
MNZL has the higher dividend yield at 0.03%, compared with 0.00% for DJUN.
DJUN is categorized as Defined Outcome, while MNZL is Large Cap Blend Equities. DJUN tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect June Series Index, while MNZL tracks Russell IdealRatings Manzil Halal USA Broad Market Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Manzil. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DJUN and 0.40% for MNZL.
Find the right allocation for DJUN and MNZL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer