PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DJUN vs. DFND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DJUN vs. DFND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June (DJUN) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DJUN

1D
0.01%
1M
0.88%
YTD
3.78%
6M
4.53%
1Y
10.92%
3Y*
11.40%
5Y*
8.19%
10Y*

DFND

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
-1.09%
1Y
0.20%
3Y*
7.91%
5Y*
4.54%
10Y*
7.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DJUN vs. DFND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DJUN
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June
3.78%9.38%13.92%17.58%-6.30%6.27%6.48%
DFND
Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF
0.00%10.37%8.48%12.13%-19.59%14.80%7.14%

Correlation

The correlation between DJUN and DFND is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2020

0.45

Over the past year, the correlation between DJUN and DFND has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DJUN vs. DFND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DJUN
DJUN Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
DJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
DJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
DJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

DFND
DFND Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
DFND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFND Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFND Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
DFND Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFND Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DJUN vs. DFND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June (DJUN) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DJUNDFNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.02

+0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.51

0.07

+3.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.66

0.13

+20.53

DJUN vs. DFND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DJUN Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is higher than the DFND Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DJUN and DFND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DJUNDFNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

0.02

+2.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

0.21

+0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.04

0.36

+0.69

Drawdowns

DJUN vs. DFND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DJUN drawdown since its inception was -11.96%, smaller than the maximum DFND drawdown of -22.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJUN and DFND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DJUNDFNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.96%

-22.65%

+10.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.15%

-3.44%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.96%

-12.56%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.96%

-22.65%

+10.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.69%

+3.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.59%

-5.70%

+4.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.53%

3.70%

-3.17%

Volatility

DJUN vs. DFND - Volatility Comparison

FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June (DJUN) has a higher volatility of 0.25% compared to Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) at 0.00%. This indicates that DJUN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DJUNDFNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.25%

0.00%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.55%

6.16%

-2.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.04%

10.92%

-5.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.52%

22.46%

-13.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.06%

19.09%

-11.03%

DJUN vs. DFND - Expense Ratio Comparison

DJUN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than DFND's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

DJUN vs. DFND - Dividend Comparison

DJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DFND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFND
Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF
0.62%1.10%1.64%1.84%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.77%0.53%0.02%
DJUN
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DJUN and DFND have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DJUN has higher volatility (0.25%) compared to DFND (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DJUN dropped -11.96% vs DFND's -22.65%.

On 5-year performance, DJUN leads with 8.19% vs 4.54% for DFND. On fees, DJUN is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, DFND has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DJUN has performed better with a 8.19% return vs 4.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DJUN is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.

DFND has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for DJUN.

DJUN tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect June Series Index, while DFND tracks Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and SRN Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DJUN and 1.50% for DFND.

DJUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DJUN and DFND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer