DJUL vs. QFLR

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - July (DJUL) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR).

DJUL and QFLR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DJUL is a passively managed fund by FT Vest that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect July Series Index. It was launched on Jul 16, 2020. QFLR is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Jan 24, 2024.

Performance

DJUL vs. QFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - July (DJUL) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DJUL vs. QFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DJUL FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - July	-1.22%	13.31%	12.97%
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF	-2.22%	17.27%	16.64%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DJUL achieves a -1.22% return, which is significantly higher than QFLR's -2.22% return.

DJUL

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: -1.96%
• YTD: -1.22%
• 6M: 0.39%
• 1Y: 14.66%
• 3Y*: 13.26%
• 5Y*: 7.79%
• 10Y*: —

QFLR

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: -2.97%
• YTD: -2.22%
• 6M: 0.78%
• 1Y: 23.46%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DJUL vs. QFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DJUL has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than QFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.

QFLR

Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF

DJUL

FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - July

Return for Risk

DJUL vs. QFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DJUL

DJUL Risk / Return Rank: 79
DJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
DJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
DJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 86
DJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
DJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 84

QFLR

QFLR Risk / Return Rank: 89
QFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
QFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
QFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 86
QFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
QFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DJUL vs. QFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - July (DJUL) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DJUL	QFLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.47	1.91	-0.44
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	2.62	-0.45
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.36	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.09	3.17	-1.07
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.86	13.59	-2.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DJUL vs. QFLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DJUL Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the QFLR Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DJUL and QFLR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DJUL	QFLR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.47	1.91	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.00	1.11	-0.12

Correlation

The correlation between DJUL and QFLR is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

DJUL vs. QFLR - Dividend Comparison

Neither DJUL nor QFLR has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024
DJUL FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - July	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF	0.00%	0.02%	0.03%

Drawdowns

DJUL vs. QFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DJUL drawdown since its inception was -12.54%, smaller than the maximum QFLR drawdown of -13.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJUL and QFLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	DJUL	QFLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.54%	-13.97%	+1.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.11%	-7.61%	+0.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.54%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.27%	-4.77%	+2.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.05%	-2.61%	+0.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.37%	1.77%	-0.40%

Volatility

DJUL vs. QFLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - July (DJUL) is 2.91%, while Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) has a volatility of 4.97%. This indicates that DJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QFLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DJUL	QFLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.91%	4.97%	-2.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.34%	9.49%	-5.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.00%	12.32%	-2.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.35%	12.89%	-4.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.02%	12.89%	-4.87%