DJUL vs. FOCT
DJUL (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - July) and FOCT (FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - DJUL is a Options Trading fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect July Series Index, while FOCT is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by FT Vest. DJUL is passively managed, while FOCT is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DJUL returned 8.92%/yr vs 9.14%/yr for FOCT. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.85% expense ratio.
Performance
DJUL vs. FOCT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DJUL achieves a 4.89% return, which is significantly lower than FOCT's 6.65% return.
DJUL
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 1.61%
- YTD
- 4.89%
- 6M
- 5.60%
- 1Y
- 16.12%
- 3Y*
- 14.05%
- 5Y*
- 8.92%
- 10Y*
- —
FOCT
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 2.64%
- YTD
- 6.65%
- 6M
- 7.15%
- 1Y
- 20.11%
- 3Y*
- 12.77%
- 5Y*
- 9.14%
- 10Y*
- —
DJUL vs. FOCT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DJUL FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - July | 4.89% | 13.31% | 15.02% | 18.08% | -8.28% | 6.18% | 2.75% |
FOCT FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October | 6.65% | 14.92% | 9.62% | 17.81% | -7.59% | 13.13% | 6.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between DJUL and FOCT is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2020 | 0.90 |
The correlation between DJUL and FOCT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
DJUL vs. FOCT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DJUL
FOCT
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
DJUL
FOCT
Financial Services
DJUL
FOCT
Communication Services
DJUL
FOCT
Consumer Cyclical
DJUL
FOCT
Healthcare
DJUL
FOCT
Industrials
DJUL
FOCT
Consumer Defensive
DJUL
FOCT
Energy
DJUL
FOCT
Utilities
DJUL
FOCT
Real Estate
DJUL
FOCT
Basic Materials
DJUL
FOCT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DJUL vs. FOCT — Risk / Return Rank
DJUL
FOCT
DJUL vs. FOCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - July (DJUL) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October (FOCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DJUL | FOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.49 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.81 | 3.52 | +0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.56 | 17.32 | +3.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DJUL | FOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.88 | 2.53 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.07 | 0.83 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.12 | 0.98 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
DJUL vs. FOCT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DJUL drawdown since its inception was -12.54%, smaller than the maximum FOCT drawdown of -14.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJUL and FOCT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DJUL | FOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.54% | -14.07% | +1.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.25% | -5.74% | +1.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.29% | -13.06% | +1.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.54% | -14.07% | +1.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.23% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.99% | -2.25% | +0.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.79% | 1.16% | -0.37% |
Volatility
DJUL vs. FOCT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - July (DJUL) is 0.57%, while FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October (FOCT) has a volatility of 1.22%. This indicates that DJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FOCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DJUL | FOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.57% | 1.22% | -0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.16% | 5.94% | -1.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.64% | 7.99% | -2.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.39% | 11.07% | -2.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.94% | 10.89% | -2.95% |
DJUL vs. FOCT - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DJUL and FOCT have an expense ratio of 0.85%.
Dividends
DJUL vs. FOCT - Dividend Comparison
Neither DJUL nor FOCT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, DJUL and FOCT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FOCT has higher volatility (1.22%) compared to DJUL (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DJUL dropped -12.54% vs FOCT's -14.07%.
On 5-year performance, FOCT leads with 9.14% vs 8.92% for DJUL. Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. On volatility, DJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FOCT has performed better with a 9.14% return vs 8.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DJUL and FOCT have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.
DJUL and FOCT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
DJUL is categorized as Options Trading, while FOCT is Defined Outcome.
DJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DJUL and FOCT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer