PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DJUL vs. BUFD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DJUL vs. BUFD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - July (DJUL) and FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF (BUFD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DJUL achieves a 4.86% return, which is significantly lower than BUFD's 5.17% return.


DJUL

1D
-0.02%
1M
1.35%
YTD
4.86%
6M
5.63%
1Y
16.81%
3Y*
14.03%
5Y*
8.95%
10Y*

BUFD

1D
-0.07%
1M
1.78%
YTD
5.17%
6M
5.92%
1Y
14.85%
3Y*
12.12%
5Y*
7.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DJUL vs. BUFD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DJUL
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - July
4.86%13.31%15.02%18.08%-8.28%5.80%
BUFD
FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF
5.17%10.66%12.42%15.40%-7.70%5.97%

Correlation

The correlation between DJUL and BUFD is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2021

0.86

The correlation between DJUL and BUFD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

DJUL vs. BUFD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DJUL
BUFD

Technology

36.2%
36.2%

Financial Services

11.9%
11.9%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.4%

Industrials

8.1%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

3.5%
3.5%

Utilities

2.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

DJUL
36.2%
BUFD
36.2%

Financial Services

DJUL
11.9%
BUFD
11.9%

Communication Services

DJUL
10.9%
BUFD
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

DJUL
10.1%
BUFD
10.1%

Healthcare

DJUL
8.4%
BUFD
8.4%

Industrials

DJUL
8.1%
BUFD
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

DJUL
4.9%
BUFD
4.9%

Energy

DJUL
3.5%
BUFD
3.5%

Utilities

DJUL
2.3%
BUFD
2.3%

Real Estate

DJUL
1.9%
BUFD
1.9%

Basic Materials

DJUL
1.8%
BUFD
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DJUL vs. BUFD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DJUL
DJUL Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
DJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
DJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
DJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFD
BUFD Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
BUFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFD Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DJUL vs. BUFD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - July (DJUL) and FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF (BUFD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DJULBUFDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.99

2.87

+0.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.53

4.44

+0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.60

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.01

4.46

-0.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

21.68

24.34

-2.66

DJUL vs. BUFD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DJUL Sharpe Ratio is 2.99, which is comparable to the BUFD Sharpe Ratio of 2.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DJUL and BUFD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DJULBUFDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.99

2.87

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.07

1.00

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.11

1.00

+0.11

Drawdowns

DJUL vs. BUFD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DJUL drawdown since its inception was -12.54%, which is greater than BUFD's maximum drawdown of -10.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJUL and BUFD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DJULBUFDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.54%

-10.75%

-1.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.25%

-3.43%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.29%

-10.15%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.54%

-10.75%

-1.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-0.07%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.00%

-1.97%

-0.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.79%

0.63%

+0.16%

Volatility

DJUL vs. BUFD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - July (DJUL) is 0.64%, while FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF (BUFD) has a volatility of 0.78%. This indicates that DJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BUFD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DJULBUFDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.64%

0.78%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.16%

3.94%

+0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.65%

5.20%

+0.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.39%

7.73%

+0.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.94%

7.55%

+0.39%

DJUL vs. BUFD - Expense Ratio Comparison

DJUL has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFD's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

DJUL vs. BUFD - Dividend Comparison

Neither DJUL nor BUFD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, DJUL and BUFD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BUFD has higher volatility (0.78%) compared to DJUL (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DJUL dropped -12.54% vs BUFD's -10.75%.

On 5-year performance, DJUL leads with 8.95% vs 7.68% for BUFD. On fees, DJUL is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, DJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DJUL has performed better with a 8.95% return vs 7.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DJUL is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFD.

DJUL and BUFD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

DJUL is categorized as Options Trading, while BUFD is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DJUL and 0.95% for BUFD.

DJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 2.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DJUL and BUFD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer