PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DJP vs. CRSOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DJP vs. CRSOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN (DJP) and Credit Suisse Commodity Return Strategy Fund (CRSOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DJP achieves a 30.63% return, which is significantly higher than CRSOX's 27.02% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DJP having a 7.36% annualized return and CRSOX not far ahead at 7.38%.


DJP

1D
0.02%
1M
-3.31%
YTD
30.63%
6M
29.34%
1Y
44.52%
3Y*
17.94%
5Y*
12.46%
10Y*
7.36%

CRSOX

1D
0.39%
1M
-2.64%
YTD
27.02%
6M
26.55%
1Y
39.05%
3Y*
16.16%
5Y*
12.10%
10Y*
7.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DJP vs. CRSOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DJP
iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN
30.63%17.20%5.59%-9.85%17.46%31.05%-4.12%7.63%-13.07%0.74%
CRSOX
Credit Suisse Commodity Return Strategy Fund
27.02%15.66%5.21%-8.88%16.40%28.99%-1.12%6.99%-11.65%1.75%

Correlation

The correlation between DJP and CRSOX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2006

0.95

The correlation between DJP and CRSOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DJP vs. CRSOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DJP
DJP Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
DJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
DJP Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
DJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DJP Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

CRSOX
CRSOX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
CRSOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRSOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRSOX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
CRSOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRSOX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DJP vs. CRSOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN (DJP) and Credit Suisse Commodity Return Strategy Fund (CRSOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DJPCRSOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.43

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.20

5.29

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.30

14.39

-1.09

DJP vs. CRSOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DJP Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the CRSOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DJP and CRSOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DJPCRSOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

2.44

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.76

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.52

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

0.08

-0.08

Drawdowns

DJP vs. CRSOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DJP drawdown since its inception was -78.35%, which is greater than CRSOX's maximum drawdown of -74.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJP and CRSOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DJPCRSOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.35%

-74.26%

-4.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.61%

-7.49%

-1.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.41%

-11.43%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.98%

-25.50%

-3.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.36%

-31.89%

-6.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.82%

-28.44%

-4.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.86%

-45.15%

-5.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.36%

2.74%

+0.62%

Volatility

DJP vs. CRSOX - Volatility Comparison

iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN (DJP) has a higher volatility of 5.85% compared to Credit Suisse Commodity Return Strategy Fund (CRSOX) at 5.30%. This indicates that DJP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRSOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DJPCRSOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.85%

5.30%

+0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.64%

14.12%

+2.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.92%

16.32%

+2.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.96%

16.07%

+2.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.06%

14.33%

+2.73%

DJP vs. CRSOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DJP has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than CRSOX's 0.81% expense ratio.


Dividends

DJP vs. CRSOX - Dividend Comparison

DJP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CRSOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.30%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CRSOX
Credit Suisse Commodity Return Strategy Fund
6.30%4.78%3.39%3.38%16.50%39.76%0.14%1.20%1.12%2.75%
DJP
iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, DJP and CRSOX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DJP has higher volatility (5.85%) compared to CRSOX (5.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DJP dropped -78.35% vs CRSOX's -74.26%.

CRSOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DJP and CRSOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer