PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRSOX vs. CCRSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRSOX vs. CCRSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Credit Suisse Commodity Return Strategy Fund (CRSOX) and Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio (CCRSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CRSOX having a 27.02% return and CCRSX slightly higher at 27.42%. Over the past 10 years, CRSOX has outperformed CCRSX with an annualized return of 7.38%, while CCRSX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.04% annualized return.


CRSOX

1D
0.39%
1M
-2.64%
YTD
27.02%
6M
26.55%
1Y
39.05%
3Y*
16.16%
5Y*
12.10%
10Y*
7.38%

CCRSX

1D
0.35%
1M
-2.74%
YTD
27.42%
6M
26.84%
1Y
39.17%
3Y*
15.98%
5Y*
11.72%
10Y*
6.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRSOX vs. CCRSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CRSOX
Credit Suisse Commodity Return Strategy Fund
27.02%15.66%5.21%-8.88%16.40%28.99%-1.12%6.99%-11.65%1.75%
CCRSX
Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio
27.42%15.37%4.86%-8.88%15.71%28.00%-1.49%6.69%-11.63%-7.99%

Correlation

The correlation between CRSOX and CCRSX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2006

0.99

The correlation between CRSOX and CCRSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRSOX vs. CCRSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRSOX
CRSOX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
CRSOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRSOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRSOX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
CRSOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRSOX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

CCRSX
CCRSX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
CCRSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCRSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCRSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
CCRSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCRSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRSOX vs. CCRSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credit Suisse Commodity Return Strategy Fund (CRSOX) and Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio (CCRSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRSOXCCRSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.43

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.29

5.27

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.39

14.18

+0.21

CRSOX vs. CCRSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRSOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the CCRSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRSOX and CCRSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRSOXCCRSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

2.43

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.05

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.04

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

-0.00

+0.08

Drawdowns

CRSOX vs. CCRSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRSOX drawdown since its inception was -74.26%, smaller than the maximum CCRSX drawdown of -93.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRSOX and CCRSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRSOXCCRSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.26%

-93.56%

+19.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.49%

-7.53%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.43%

-11.56%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.50%

-83.30%

+57.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.89%

-83.30%

+51.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.44%

-39.88%

+11.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.15%

-51.08%

+5.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

2.79%

-0.05%

Volatility

CRSOX vs. CCRSX - Volatility Comparison

Credit Suisse Commodity Return Strategy Fund (CRSOX) and Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio (CCRSX) have volatilities of 5.30% and 5.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRSOXCCRSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.30%

5.32%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.12%

14.26%

-0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.32%

16.45%

-0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.07%

225.85%

-209.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.33%

159.90%

-145.57%

CRSOX vs. CCRSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRSOX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is lower than CCRSX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

CRSOX vs. CCRSX - Dividend Comparison

CRSOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.30%, less than CCRSX's 10.88% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CCRSX
Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio
10.88%3.98%2.95%26.59%18.97%4.82%5.51%0.86%2.91%0.00%
CRSOX
Credit Suisse Commodity Return Strategy Fund
6.30%4.78%3.39%3.38%16.50%39.76%0.14%1.20%1.12%2.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, CRSOX and CCRSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CCRSX has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to CRSOX (5.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRSOX dropped -74.26% vs CCRSX's -93.56%.

CRSOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRSOX and CCRSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer