DJP vs. COMB
Compare and contrast key facts about iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN (DJP) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB).
DJP and COMB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DJP is a passively managed fund by Barclays Capital that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Commodity Index. It was launched on Jun 6, 2006. COMB is an actively managed fund by GraniteShares. It was launched on May 22, 2017.
Performance
DJP vs. COMB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DJP vs. COMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DJP iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN | 26.62% | 17.20% | 5.59% | -9.85% | 17.46% | 31.05% | -4.12% | 7.63% | -13.07% | 4.99% |
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF | 23.16% | 15.12% | 5.24% | -7.75% | 14.56% | 26.34% | -2.95% | 7.02% | -11.41% | 4.98% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DJP achieves a 26.62% return, which is significantly higher than COMB's 23.16% return.
DJP
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- 9.10%
- YTD
- 26.62%
- 6M
- 33.73%
- 1Y
- 34.63%
- 3Y*
- 14.66%
- 5Y*
- 14.92%
- 10Y*
- 8.41%
COMB
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- 7.93%
- YTD
- 23.16%
- 6M
- 29.16%
- 1Y
- 30.35%
- 3Y*
- 13.36%
- 5Y*
- 13.26%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DJP vs. COMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
DJP has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than COMB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DJP vs. COMB — Risk / Return Rank
DJP
COMB
DJP vs. COMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN (DJP) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DJP | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.80 | 1.77 | +0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.36 | 2.34 | +0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.33 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.28 | 3.30 | -0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.99 | 9.08 | -0.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DJP | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 1.77 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.81 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 0.51 | -0.52 |
Correlation
The correlation between DJP and COMB is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DJP vs. COMB - Dividend Comparison
DJP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.35%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DJP iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF | 7.35% | 9.05% | 2.48% | 6.57% | 30.85% | 15.83% | 0.07% | 1.48% | 0.97% | 0.20% |
Drawdowns
DJP vs. COMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DJP drawdown since its inception was -78.35%, which is greater than COMB's maximum drawdown of -33.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJP and COMB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DJP | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.35% | -33.50% | -44.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.64% | -9.19% | -1.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.98% | -26.63% | -2.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.36% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.88% | -1.01% | -33.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.02% | -12.25% | -38.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.88% | 3.34% | +0.54% |
Volatility
DJP vs. COMB - Volatility Comparison
iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN (DJP) has a higher volatility of 8.27% compared to GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB) at 7.63%. This indicates that DJP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DJP | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.27% | 7.63% | +0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.27% | 13.86% | +1.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.36% | 17.20% | +2.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.78% | 16.54% | +2.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.00% | 15.05% | +1.95% |