PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DJIA vs. QRMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DJIA vs. QRMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF (DJIA) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DJIA vs. QRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DJIA
Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF
-1.83%9.11%14.52%9.15%-2.80%
QRMI
Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF
-2.50%3.76%14.72%11.73%-10.86%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DJIA achieves a -1.83% return, which is significantly higher than QRMI's -2.50% return.


DJIA

1D
0.38%
1M
-4.60%
YTD
-1.83%
6M
3.58%
1Y
6.73%
3Y*
9.17%
5Y*
10Y*

QRMI

1D
0.75%
1M
-2.37%
YTD
-2.50%
6M
1.31%
1Y
2.76%
3Y*
6.39%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DJIA vs. QRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DJIA and QRMI have an expense ratio of 0.60%.


Return for Risk

DJIA vs. QRMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DJIA
DJIA Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
DJIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DJIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
DJIA Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
DJIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
DJIA Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

QRMI
QRMI Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
QRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
QRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
QRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
QRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DJIA vs. QRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF (DJIA) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DJIAQRMIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.52

0.36

+0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.83

0.55

+0.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.08

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.75

0.55

+0.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.05

1.59

+1.46

DJIA vs. QRMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DJIA Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is higher than the QRMI Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DJIA and QRMI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DJIAQRMIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

0.36

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.09

+0.50

Correlation

The correlation between DJIA and QRMI is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

DJIA vs. QRMI - Dividend Comparison

DJIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.42%, less than QRMI's 12.66% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
DJIA
Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF
11.42%10.60%11.44%7.16%9.18%0.00%
QRMI
Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF
12.66%12.28%11.80%12.44%10.65%3.36%

Drawdowns

DJIA vs. QRMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DJIA drawdown since its inception was -16.91%, smaller than the maximum QRMI drawdown of -20.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJIA and QRMI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DJIAQRMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.91%

-20.95%

+4.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.20%

-5.04%

-4.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.23%

-3.54%

-1.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.63%

-8.25%

+4.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.25%

1.74%

+0.51%

Volatility

DJIA vs. QRMI - Volatility Comparison

Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF (DJIA) has a higher volatility of 4.12% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) at 3.02%. This indicates that DJIA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QRMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DJIAQRMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.12%

3.02%

+1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.08%

4.93%

+1.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.05%

7.77%

+5.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.32%

8.46%

+2.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.32%

8.46%

+2.86%