JANP vs. PBJA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

JANP (PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - January) and PBJA (PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - January) are both Options Trading funds from PGIM. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JANP returned 16.14% vs 11.81% for PBJA. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.

Performance

JANP vs. PBJA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - January (JANP) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - January (PBJA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JANP achieves a 5.34% return, which is significantly higher than PBJA's 3.96% return.

JANP

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: 5.34%
• 6M: 5.50%
• 1Y: 16.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PBJA

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 0.04%
• YTD: 3.96%
• 6M: 4.17%
• 1Y: 11.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JANP vs. PBJA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
JANP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - January	5.34%	13.33%	15.74%
PBJA PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - January	3.96%	10.33%	12.05%

Correlation

The correlation between JANP and PBJA is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2024	0.96

The correlation between JANP and PBJA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JANP vs. PBJA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JANP

JANP Risk / Return Rank: 80
JANP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
JANP Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
JANP Omega Ratio Rank: 86
JANP Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
JANP Martin Ratio Rank: 84

PBJA

PBJA Risk / Return Rank: 85
PBJA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
PBJA Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
PBJA Omega Ratio Rank: 90
PBJA Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
PBJA Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JANP vs. PBJA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - January (JANP) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - January (PBJA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JANP	PBJA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.34	2.55	-0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.34	3.79	-0.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.54	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.05	3.31	-0.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.67	17.76	-2.10

JANP vs. PBJA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JANP Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the PBJA Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JANP and PBJA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JANP vs. PBJA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JANP drawdown since its inception was -12.18%, which is greater than PBJA's maximum drawdown of -8.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANP and PBJA.

Drawdown Indicators

	JANP	PBJA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.18%	-8.50%	-3.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.32%	-3.58%	-1.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.90%	-0.56%	-0.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.89%	-0.55%	-0.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.03%	0.67%	+0.36%

Volatility

JANP vs. PBJA - Volatility Comparison

PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - January (JANP) has a higher volatility of 2.33% compared to PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - January (PBJA) at 1.37%. This indicates that JANP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBJA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JANP	PBJA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.33%	1.37%	+0.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.86%	3.93%	+1.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.94%	4.68%	+2.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.07%	6.36%	+2.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.07%	6.36%	+2.71%

JANP vs. PBJA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JANP and PBJA have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

Dividends

JANP vs. PBJA - Dividend Comparison

Neither JANP nor PBJA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JANP and PBJA in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, JANP and PBJA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, JANP or PBJA?

JANP has higher volatility (2.33%) compared to PBJA (1.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JANP dropped -12.18% vs PBJA's -8.50%.

Which ETF is better, JANP or PBJA?

On 1-year performance, JANP leads with 16.14% vs 11.81% for PBJA. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, PBJA has been the lower-risk option at 1.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JANP or PBJA?

Over the 1-year period, JANP has performed better with a 16.14% return vs 11.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JANP or PBJA?

JANP and PBJA have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JANP or PBJA?

JANP and PBJA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PBJA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.