FAPR vs. SPMO

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FAPR (FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FAPR is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FAPR returned 8.79%/yr vs 24.25%/yr for SPMO. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FAPR charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.

Performance

FAPR vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (FAPR) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAPR achieves a 4.86% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 36.08% return.

FAPR

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 4.86%
• 6M: 5.02%
• 1Y: 12.29%
• 3Y*: 12.98%
• 5Y*: 8.79%
• 10Y*: —

SPMO

• 1D: 1.26%
• 1M: 11.71%
• YTD: 36.08%
• 6M: 35.05%
• 1Y: 52.78%
• 3Y*: 44.69%
• 5Y*: 24.25%
• 10Y*: 21.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAPR vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FAPR FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April	4.86%	7.58%	18.14%	19.50%	-10.33%	8.50%
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF	36.08%	26.58%	45.82%	17.56%	-10.45%	13.42%

Correlation

The correlation between FAPR and SPMO is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2021	0.79

The correlation between FAPR and SPMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

FAPR vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FAPR	SPMO
Technology	39.0%	56.8%
Financial Services	11.1%	5.8%
Communication Services	10.6%	8.0%
Consumer Cyclical	9.9%	1.1%
Healthcare	8.3%	5.9%
Industrials	7.8%	10.9%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	3.8%
Energy	3.1%	2.8%
Utilities	2.1%	2.6%
Real Estate	1.8%	0.9%
Basic Materials	1.7%	1.5%

Return for Risk

FAPR vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAPR

FAPR Risk / Return Rank: 93
FAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
FAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
FAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 94
FAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
FAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 96

SPMO

SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 83
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 83
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAPR vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (FAPR) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FAPR	SPMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.86	2.65	+0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.34	3.46	+0.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.65	1.48	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.58	4.18	+1.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	36.56	15.78	+20.78

FAPR vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAPR Sharpe Ratio is 2.86, which is comparable to the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAPR and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FAPR vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAPR drawdown since its inception was -15.96%, smaller than the maximum SPMO drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAPR and SPMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FAPR	SPMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.96%	-30.95%	+14.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.21%	-12.70%	+10.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.64%	-20.13%	+8.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.96%	-22.74%	+6.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-30.95%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.55%	0.00%	-0.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.69%	-4.59%	+1.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.34%	3.35%	-3.01%

Volatility

FAPR vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (FAPR) is 2.46%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 10.55%. This indicates that FAPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FAPR	SPMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.46%	10.55%	-8.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.66%	17.11%	-13.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.33%	20.05%	-15.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.53%	19.77%	-9.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.43%	20.55%	-10.12%

FAPR vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAPR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.

Dividends

FAPR vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

FAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FAPR FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF	0.78%	0.73%	0.48%	1.63%	1.66%	0.52%	1.27%	1.39%	1.05%	0.77%	1.94%	0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FAPR and SPMO in my portfolio?

FAPR and SPMO have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FAPR or SPMO?

SPMO has higher volatility (10.55%) compared to FAPR (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAPR dropped -15.96% vs SPMO's -30.95%.

Which ETF is better, FAPR or SPMO?

On 5-year performance, SPMO leads with 24.25% vs 8.79% for FAPR. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, FAPR has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FAPR or SPMO?

Over the 5-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 24.25% return vs 8.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FAPR or SPMO?

SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FAPR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FAPR or SPMO?

SPMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.00% for FAPR.

What is the main difference between FAPR and SPMO?

FAPR is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SPMO is Momentum. FAPR tracks S&P 500, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FAPR and 0.13% for SPMO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 2.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.