PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIVO vs. QDPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIVO vs. QDPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIVO achieves a 5.53% return, which is significantly lower than QDPL's 10.40% return.


DIVO

1D
-0.54%
1M
2.34%
YTD
5.53%
6M
5.82%
1Y
18.37%
3Y*
15.35%
5Y*
10.61%
10Y*

QDPL

1D
-0.65%
1M
5.23%
YTD
10.40%
6M
10.54%
1Y
26.37%
3Y*
20.64%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIVO vs. QDPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DIVO
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
5.53%17.40%16.22%6.95%-1.46%7.49%
QDPL
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF
10.40%16.52%22.83%23.66%-16.25%8.32%

Correlation

The correlation between DIVO and QDPL is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2021

0.78

The correlation between DIVO and QDPL shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DIVO vs. QDPL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DIVO
QDPL

Financial Services

30.3%
10.3%

Industrials

16.2%
6.3%

Technology

14.5%
27.6%

Consumer Cyclical

11.6%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

6.9%
4.0%

Energy

6.8%
2.4%

Healthcare

6.7%
7.6%

Basic Materials

4.1%
1.4%

Utilities

2.0%
2.1%

Communication Services

1.0%
8.5%

Real Estate

-

1.5%

Financial Services

DIVO
30.3%
QDPL
10.3%

Industrials

DIVO
16.2%
QDPL
6.3%

Technology

DIVO
14.5%
QDPL
27.6%

Consumer Cyclical

DIVO
11.6%
QDPL
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

DIVO
6.9%
QDPL
4.0%

Energy

DIVO
6.8%
QDPL
2.4%

Healthcare

DIVO
6.7%
QDPL
7.6%

Basic Materials

DIVO
4.1%
QDPL
1.4%

Utilities

DIVO
2.0%
QDPL
2.1%

Communication Services

DIVO
1.0%
QDPL
8.5%

Real Estate

DIVO

-

QDPL
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIVO vs. QDPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIVO
DIVO Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
DIVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVO Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

QDPL
QDPL Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
QDPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDPL Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
QDPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDPL Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIVO vs. QDPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DIVOQDPLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.41

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

3.06

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.21

14.37

-3.17

DIVO vs. QDPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIVO Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the QDPL Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIVO and QDPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DIVOQDPLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

2.23

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.83

+0.02

Drawdowns

DIVO vs. QDPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIVO drawdown since its inception was -30.04%, which is greater than QDPL's maximum drawdown of -22.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVO and QDPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIVOQDPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.04%

-22.59%

-7.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.95%

-8.65%

+2.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.12%

-17.75%

+5.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

-0.65%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.61%

-5.14%

+2.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

1.84%

-0.20%

Volatility

DIVO vs. QDPL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) is 2.01%, while Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) has a volatility of 2.69%. This indicates that DIVO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIVOQDPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.01%

2.69%

-0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.88%

9.00%

-2.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.97%

11.89%

-2.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.94%

15.01%

-3.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.84%

15.01%

-0.17%

DIVO vs. QDPL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIVO has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than QDPL's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

DIVO vs. QDPL - Dividend Comparison

DIVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.42%, more than QDPL's 5.05% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DIVO
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
6.42%6.44%4.70%4.67%4.76%4.79%4.91%8.16%5.27%3.83%
QDPL
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF
5.05%4.84%5.43%6.30%7.27%2.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DIVO and QDPL have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QDPL has higher volatility (2.69%) compared to DIVO (2.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVO dropped -30.04% vs QDPL's -22.59%.

On 3-year performance, QDPL leads with 20.64% vs 15.35% for DIVO. On fees, DIVO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, DIVO has been the lower-risk option at 2.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, QDPL has performed better with a 20.64% return vs 15.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIVO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QDPL.

DIVO has the higher dividend yield at 6.42%, compared with 5.05% for QDPL.

DIVO is categorized as Derivative Income, while QDPL is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for DIVO and 0.60% for QDPL.

QDPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIVO and QDPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer