DIVO vs. FNGO
DIVO (Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) and FNGO (MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - DIVO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify, while FNGO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index (+200%). DIVO is actively managed, while FNGO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DIVO returned 10.72%/yr vs 27.19%/yr for FNGO. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DIVO charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FNGO.
Performance
DIVO vs. FNGO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIVO achieves a 5.28% return, which is significantly lower than FNGO's 13.62% return.
DIVO
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 5.28%
- 6M
- 5.66%
- 1Y
- 17.72%
- 3Y*
- 15.15%
- 5Y*
- 10.72%
- 10Y*
- —
FNGO
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- -1.56%
- YTD
- 13.62%
- 6M
- 2.77%
- 1Y
- 33.20%
- 3Y*
- 54.61%
- 5Y*
- 27.19%
- 10Y*
- —
DIVO vs. FNGO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 5.28% | 17.40% | 16.22% | 6.95% | -1.46% | 22.87% | 12.40% | 24.90% | -6.85% |
FNGO MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN | 13.62% | 25.49% | 101.65% | 240.10% | -71.55% | 28.38% | 238.00% | 79.61% | -40.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIVO and FNGO is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2018 | 0.49 |
The correlation between DIVO and FNGO shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DIVO vs. FNGO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DIVO
FNGO
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
-
Financial Services
DIVO
FNGO
Industrials
DIVO
FNGO
-
Technology
DIVO
FNGO
Consumer Cyclical
DIVO
FNGO
Consumer Defensive
DIVO
FNGO
-
Energy
DIVO
FNGO
-
Healthcare
DIVO
FNGO
-
Basic Materials
DIVO
FNGO
-
Utilities
DIVO
FNGO
-
Communication Services
DIVO
FNGO
Real Estate
DIVO
-
FNGO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIVO vs. FNGO — Risk / Return Rank
DIVO
FNGO
DIVO vs. FNGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) and MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DIVO | FNGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.16 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.99 | 0.78 | +2.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.79 | 2.04 | +8.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DIVO | FNGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96 | 0.81 | +1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 0.45 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.63 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
DIVO vs. FNGO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIVO drawdown since its inception was -30.04%, smaller than the maximum FNGO drawdown of -78.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVO and FNGO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIVO | FNGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.04% | -78.39% | +48.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.95% | -42.73% | +36.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.12% | -47.64% | +35.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.72% | -78.39% | +64.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.27% | -14.93% | +13.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.61% | -23.89% | +21.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.65% | 16.28% | -14.63% |
Volatility
DIVO vs. FNGO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) is 2.30%, while MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) has a volatility of 17.22%. This indicates that DIVO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIVO | FNGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.30% | 17.22% | -14.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.02% | 32.93% | -25.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.09% | 41.39% | -32.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.95% | 60.45% | -48.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.84% | 61.64% | -46.80% |
DIVO vs. FNGO - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIVO has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than FNGO's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIVO vs. FNGO - Dividend Comparison
DIVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.43%, while FNGO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 6.43% | 6.44% | 4.70% | 4.67% | 4.76% | 4.79% | 4.91% | 8.16% | 5.27% | 3.83% |
FNGO MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIVO and FNGO have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FNGO has higher volatility (17.22%) compared to DIVO (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVO dropped -30.04% vs FNGO's -78.39%.
On 5-year performance, FNGO leads with 27.19% vs 10.72% for DIVO. On fees, DIVO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, DIVO has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FNGO has performed better with a 27.19% return vs 10.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIVO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FNGO.
DIVO has the higher dividend yield at 6.43%, compared with 0.00% for FNGO.
DIVO is categorized as Derivative Income, while FNGO is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Bank of Montreal. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for DIVO and 0.95% for FNGO.
DIVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIVO and FNGO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer