DIVI vs. FLCH
DIVI (Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF) and FLCH (Franklin FTSE China ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DIVI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while FLCH is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China RIC Capped Index. DIVI is actively managed, while FLCH is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DIVI returned 13.83%/yr vs -4.43%/yr for FLCH. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DIVI charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLCH.
Performance
DIVI vs. FLCH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIVI achieves a 11.74% return, which is significantly higher than FLCH's -4.71% return.
DIVI
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 2.87%
- YTD
- 11.74%
- 6M
- 14.97%
- 1Y
- 26.70%
- 3Y*
- 18.52%
- 5Y*
- 13.83%
- 10Y*
- —
FLCH
- 1D
- 2.58%
- 1M
- -1.61%
- YTD
- -4.71%
- 6M
- -6.63%
- 1Y
- 11.26%
- 3Y*
- 11.28%
- 5Y*
- -4.43%
- 10Y*
- —
DIVI vs. FLCH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVI Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 11.74% | 34.86% | 1.77% | 18.97% | -1.21% | 16.95% | 1.29% | 22.98% | -6.73% | 0.36% |
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | -4.71% | 32.55% | 18.00% | -11.21% | -22.74% | -20.87% | 30.09% | 24.32% | -19.52% | 0.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIVI and FLCH is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017 | 0.52 |
The correlation between DIVI and FLCH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
DIVI vs. FLCH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DIVI
FLCH
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
Real Estate
Financial Services
DIVI
FLCH
Industrials
DIVI
FLCH
Technology
DIVI
FLCH
Healthcare
DIVI
FLCH
Consumer Cyclical
DIVI
FLCH
Consumer Defensive
DIVI
FLCH
Basic Materials
DIVI
FLCH
Communication Services
DIVI
FLCH
Utilities
DIVI
FLCH
Energy
DIVI
FLCH
Real Estate
DIVI
FLCH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIVI vs. FLCH — Risk / Return Rank
DIVI
FLCH
DIVI vs. FLCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DIVI | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.81 | 0.59 | +1.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.53 | 0.95 | +1.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.12 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 0.78 | +1.86 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.17 | 1.65 | +8.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DIVI | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81 | 0.59 | +1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 | -0.15 | +1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.03 | +0.65 |
Drawdowns
DIVI vs. FLCH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIVI drawdown since its inception was -27.76%, smaller than the maximum FLCH drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVI and FLCH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIVI | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.76% | -62.09% | +34.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.54% | -15.52% | +4.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.58% | -25.43% | +10.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.53% | -55.78% | +37.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.25% | -32.83% | +32.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.63% | -30.53% | +26.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.73% | 7.32% | -4.59% |
Volatility
DIVI vs. FLCH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI) is 5.28%, while Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) has a volatility of 6.40%. This indicates that DIVI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLCH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIVI | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.28% | 6.40% | -1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.16% | 13.58% | -1.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.84% | 19.16% | -4.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.29% | 29.60% | -14.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.46% | 27.91% | -11.45% |
DIVI vs. FLCH - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIVI has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than FLCH's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DIVI vs. FLCH - Dividend Comparison
DIVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, more than FLCH's 2.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVI Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 3.50% | 3.76% | 4.39% | 3.17% | 6.03% | 2.77% | 8.04% | 1.61% | 5.67% | 5.22% | 11.56% |
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | 2.48% | 2.36% | 2.87% | 3.47% | 2.69% | 1.48% | 0.91% | 1.98% | 1.92% | 0.01% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIVI and FLCH have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLCH has higher volatility (6.40%) compared to DIVI (5.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVI dropped -27.76% vs FLCH's -62.09%.
On 5-year performance, DIVI leads with 13.83% vs -4.43% for FLCH. On fees, DIVI is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, DIVI has been the lower-risk option at 5.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DIVI has performed better with a 13.83% return vs -4.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIVI is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for FLCH.
DIVI has the higher dividend yield at 3.50%, compared with 2.48% for FLCH.
DIVI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while FLCH is China Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for DIVI and 0.19% for FLCH.
DIVI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIVI and FLCH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer