PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIVI vs. FLCH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIVI vs. FLCH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIVI achieves a 10.71% return, which is significantly higher than FLCH's -12.17% return.


DIVI

1D
-2.01%
1M
-0.05%
YTD
10.71%
6M
10.37%
1Y
26.90%
3Y*
18.25%
5Y*
13.30%
10Y*
11.73%

FLCH

1D
-1.88%
1M
-5.67%
YTD
-12.17%
6M
-12.94%
1Y
-0.05%
3Y*
8.98%
5Y*
-5.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIVI vs. FLCH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DIVI
Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
10.71%34.86%1.77%18.97%-1.21%16.95%1.29%22.98%-6.73%0.62%
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
-12.17%32.55%18.00%-11.21%-22.74%-20.87%30.09%24.32%-19.52%1.51%

Correlation

The correlation between DIVI and FLCH is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.52

The correlation between DIVI and FLCH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

DIVI vs. FLCH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DIVI
FLCH

Financial Services

29.7%
14.4%

Industrials

17.3%
15.5%

Technology

12.2%
16.8%

Healthcare

7.3%
2.1%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
25.5%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%
1.2%

Basic Materials

5.2%
6.0%

Utilities

4.8%
2.0%

Communication Services

4.1%
2.1%

Energy

3.2%
12.6%

Real Estate

2.1%
1.6%

Financial Services

DIVI
29.7%
FLCH
14.4%

Industrials

DIVI
17.3%
FLCH
15.5%

Technology

DIVI
12.2%
FLCH
16.8%

Healthcare

DIVI
7.3%
FLCH
2.1%

Consumer Cyclical

DIVI
7.1%
FLCH
25.5%

Consumer Defensive

DIVI
6.4%
FLCH
1.2%

Basic Materials

DIVI
5.2%
FLCH
6.0%

Utilities

DIVI
4.8%
FLCH
2.0%

Communication Services

DIVI
4.1%
FLCH
2.1%

Energy

DIVI
3.2%
FLCH
12.6%

Real Estate

DIVI
2.1%
FLCH
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIVI vs. FLCH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIVI
DIVI Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
DIVI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVI Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVI Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

FLCH
FLCH Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
FLCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCH Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCH Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIVI vs. FLCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DIVIFLCHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.02

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

-0.00

+2.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.86

-0.01

+9.87

DIVI vs. FLCH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIVI Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is higher than the FLCH Sharpe Ratio of -0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIVI and FLCH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DIVI vs. FLCH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIVI drawdown since its inception was -27.76%, smaller than the maximum FLCH drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVI and FLCH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIVIFLCHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.76%

-62.09%

+34.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.54%

-19.59%

+9.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.58%

-25.43%

+10.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.53%

-55.78%

+37.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.01%

-38.09%

+36.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.62%

-30.55%

+26.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

8.32%

-5.59%

Volatility

DIVI vs. FLCH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI) is 5.19%, while Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) has a volatility of 5.65%. This indicates that DIVI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLCH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIVIFLCHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.19%

5.65%

-0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.95%

14.07%

-1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.34%

19.43%

-4.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.43%

29.63%

-14.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.36%

27.86%

-11.50%

DIVI vs. FLCH - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIVI has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than FLCH's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DIVI vs. FLCH - Dividend Comparison

DIVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, more than FLCH's 1.77% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DIVI
Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
2.05%3.76%4.39%3.17%6.03%2.77%8.04%1.61%5.67%5.22%11.56%
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
1.77%2.36%2.87%3.47%2.69%1.48%0.91%1.98%1.92%0.01%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DIVI and FLCH have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLCH has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to DIVI (5.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVI dropped -27.76% vs FLCH's -62.09%.

On 5-year performance, DIVI leads with 13.30% vs -5.91% for FLCH. On fees, DIVI is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, DIVI has been the lower-risk option at 5.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DIVI has performed better with a 13.30% return vs -5.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIVI is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for FLCH.

DIVI has the higher dividend yield at 2.05%, compared with 1.77% for FLCH.

DIVI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while FLCH is China Equities. DIVI tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-North America Dividend Enhanced Select Index, while FLCH tracks FTSE China RIC Capped Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for DIVI and 0.19% for FLCH.

DIVI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIVI and FLCH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer